Abstract:The rapid increase in the number of remote sensing sensors makes it possible to develop multisource feature extraction and fusion techniques to improve the classification accuracy of surface materials. It has been reported that light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data can contribute complementary information to hyperspectral images (HSIs). In this article, a multiple feature-based superpixel-level decision fusion (MFSuDF) method is proposed for HSIs and LiDAR data classification. Specifically, superpixel-guided kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is first designed and applied to HSIs to both reduce the dimensions and compress the noise impact. Next, 2-D and 3-D Gabor filters are, respectively, employed on the KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data to obtain discriminative Gabor features, and the magnitude and phase information are both taken into account. Three different modules, including the raw data-based feature cube (concatenated KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data), the Gabor magnitude feature cube, and the Gabor phase feature cube (concatenation of the corresponding Gabor features extracted from the KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data), can be, thus, achieved. After that, random forest (RF) classifier and quadrant bit coding (QBC) are introduced to separately accomplish the classification task on the aforementioned three extracted feature cubes. Alternatively, two superpixel maps are generated by utilizing the multichannel simple noniterative clustering (SNIC) and entropy rate superpixel segmentation (ERS) algorithms on the combined HSIs and LiDAR data, which are then used to regularize the three classification maps. Finally, a weighted majority voting-based decision fusion strategy is incorporated to effectively enhance the joint use of the multisource data. The proposed approach is, thus, named MFSuDF. A series of experiments are conducted on three real-world data sets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MFSuDF approach. The experimental results sh-w that our MFSuDF can achieve the overall accuracy of 73.64%, 93.88%, and 74.11% for Houston, Trento, and Missouri University and University of Florida (MUUFL) Gulport data sets, respectively, when there are only three samples per class for training.

Fusion of Spectral–Spatial Classifiers for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Image Using Improved Functional Principal Component Analysis

Fusion of Dual Spatial Information for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Hyperspectral Image Spectral–Spatial Classification Method Based on Deep Adaptive Feature Fusion

A Spectral–Spatial Feedback Close Network System for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Hybrid spatial-spectral feature in broad learning system for Hyperspectral image classification

Class Feature Weighted Hyperspectral Image Classification

A Complementary Spectral-Spatial Method for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Spectral-spatial Classification for Hyperspectral Imagery: a Novel Combination Method Based on Affinity Scoring

Multiple Feature-Based Superpixel-Level Decision Fusion for Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Classification

Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification via SVM and superpixel segmentation

Semisupervised Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery with Affinity Scoring

A Multiview Spectral–Spatial Feature Extraction and Fusion Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Hyperspectral image classification based on superpixel merging and broad learning system

Dual-View Spectral and Global Spatial Feature Fusion Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Spectral–Spatial Feature Extraction Network With SSM–CNN for Hyperspectral–Multispectral Image Collaborative Classification

Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Spectral Gradient, SVM and Spatial Random Forest

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on Decision Level Fusion

Hyperspectral Classification Based on Coupling Multiscale Super-Pixels and Spatial Spectral Features

Integration of 3-dimensional discrete wavelet transform and Markov random field for hyperspectral image classification.

Hyperspectral Image Classification via JCR and SVM Models With Decision Fusion