Safety And Efficacy Of Long-Term Exposure (Lte) To Tislelizumab In Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours

L. Shen,Y-L. Wu,Y. Yuan,Y. Bai,Q. Zhang,Q. Zhou,T. Liu,J. Zhao,S. Wang,X. Huang,H. Pan,A. Zhou,T. Sun,J. Wang,Y. Gao,S. Yang,Y. Li,J. Zhang,J. Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.666
IF: 51.769
2020-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Tislelizumab, a clinical-stage anti-PD-1 antibody, was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. Initial reports from this phase I/II study (NCT04068519) showed single-agent tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and had antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors; clinical effects and safety of long-term exposure (LTE; >12 mo) to tislelizumab are presented. Eligible pts had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors and progressed on, or were intolerant to, their last standard antitumor treatment; pts receiving prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy were ineligible. Treatment beyond progression was allowed. PD-L1 expression was assessed by the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay. Key endpoints included antitumor response, overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. As of 01 Dec 2019, of 300 enrolled pts, 70 had received tislelizumab for >12 mo (median age, 54 yr; ≥2 lines of prior systemic therapy, 49%). Median duration of treatment was 20.9 mo with 29 pts treated beyond progression. The most common tumor types of pts with LTE were NSCLC (n=16) and NPC (n=8). For all pts with LTE, ORR was 55.7%, with responses observed in both PD-L1 ≥10% and <10% pts (Table). With a median study follow-up of 24.7 mo, median duration of response and median OS were not reached. Commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included increased ALT (n=24, 34.3%) and AST (n=22, 31.4%); TRAEs across the entire study were mostly of grade ≤2 severity. Three pts (4.3%) had TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation; no pt reported a TRAE leading to death.Table: 552PBest overall response in patients with long-term exposure (>12 Months) to tislelizumab by PD-L1 statusPD-L1 ≥10% (n=18)PD-L1 <10% (n=45)PD-L1 Missing (n=7)Total (N=70)CR, n (%)0 (0)1 (2.2)0 (0)1 (1.4)PR, n (%)10 (55.6)23 (51.1)5 (71.4)38 (54.3)SD, n (%)6 (33.3)19 (42.2)1 (14.3)26 (37.1)PD, n (%)2 (11.1)2 (4.4)1 (14.3)5 (7.1)ORR, % (95% CI)55.6 (30.8, 78.5)53.3 (37.9, 68.3)71.4 (29.0, 96.3)55.7 (43.3, 67.6)Abbreviations: CI, Confidence interval; CR, complete response; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD stable disease. Open table in a new tab Abbreviations: CI, Confidence interval; CR, complete response; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD stable disease. Tislelizumab remained generally well tolerated with no new safety signals when administered for >12 mo and elicited durable responses in pts with a variety of tumor types, regardless of PD-L1 status.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?