Potential Modifiable Risk Factors And Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

J. Shen,H. Zhou,J. Liu,Y. Zhang,T. Zhou,W. Fang,Y. Yang,Y. Zhao,H. Zhao,Y. Huang,L. Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1426
IF: 51.769
2020-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for both genders, making it urgent to develop effective preventive approaches. Observational studies have been focusing on the modifiable risk factors of lung cancer, which may be biased by confounders or inverse causality. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis can be used to identify the causality between exposure and outcome, by using genetic instrumental variables as proxies and avoiding the confounding effect and inverse causality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential causality between modifiable risk factors and lung cancer, utilizing MR analysis. We included 46 modifiable risk factors identified in previous studies, of which single nucleotide polymorphism data were available. Specifically, 60 traits associated with socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle, dietary, cardiometabolic factors, developmental and growth factors, and inflammation were included. Two-sample MR was conducted to investigate the potential causalities. Risk factors were considered suggestive when the P-value was less than 0.05, or significant when less than 0.0008 (Bonferroni corrected). The SES was significantly correlated with lower risk of lung cancer, including years of schooling, college or university degree, and household income. While cigarettes smoked per day, time spent watching TV, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and arachidonic acid (AA) in blood were significantly associated with higher risk of lung cancer. Suggestive risk factors for lung cancer were found to be serum vitamin A1, copper in blood, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in blood, and body fat percentage.Table 1224PExposureOR(95%CI)P-valueYears of schooling0.49 (0.35 - 0.68)3.37E-05College or university degree0.21 (0.14 - 0.31)1.10E-14Household income0.44 (0.30 - 0.66)7.12E-05Cigarettes smoked per day1.34 (1.28 - 1.41)8.45E-35Time spent watching TV1.96 (1.32 - 2.89)7.65E-04PUFA in blood1.15 (1.06 - 1.24)4.14E-04DPA in blood7.83 (3.41 - 17.97)1.19E-06EPA in blood6.49 (2.38 - 17.68)2.57E-04AA in blood3.97 (1.92 - 8.22)2.02E-04Serum vitamin A11.44 (1.01 - 2.06)4.58E-02Cooper in blood1.14 (1.01 - 1.29)3.91E-02DHA in blood1.28 (1.07 - 1.54)6.42E-03Body fat percentage1.26 (1.06 - 1.50)1.02E-02 Open table in a new tab Approaches like improving SES, cigarette cessation, declining time spent watching TV, and reducing PUFA in blood can be effective in lung cancer prevention, considering the causalities identified in our study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?