Abstract:Abusive supervision has attracted increasing attention in Western academy of management.In mainland China,there is no such academic investigation though,in practice,abusive supervision is prevailing due to Chinese cultural root that is characterized by hierarchy and high level of power distance.To fill the gap,the study aims to address:within the context of Chinese organizations,what are the major mediating and moderation mechanisms linking abusive supervision and employee performance? Drawing on the social exchange theory,we propose that employee's trust in the supervisor will mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and employee outcomes.We also propose that employee traditionality will moderate the process that abusive supervision exerts negative influence on employee outcomes.Theoretically,this echoes the call for examining the role of followers in the process of leadership(Howell Shamir,2005).In total,338 employees and 128 their supervisors from 6 electronic manufacturing enterprises located in Beijing were sampled.To avoid the common method variance problem,two waves as well as two sources of survey were administrated.In the first wave,employees were asked to provide ratings of abusive supervision and self-reported traditionality.In the second wave,employees provided ratings of trust in supervisors.In both waves,supervisors provided ratings of employee performance including task and organizational citizenship behaviors.Time 1 performance data was controlled when predicting Time 2 performance,which was the outcome of the study.The final matched sample included 283 employees and 112 direct supervisors,resulting valid response rates 83.7% and 87.5% for employees and supervisors,respectively.Among the major measures,the 15-item abusive supervision scale was adopted from Tepper(2000)study;trust in supervisor was measured via 6 items that was adopted from Wong et al.(2002)study.The 5-item task performance scale and the 14-item organizational citizenship behavior(OCB)scale were adapted from Williams and Anderson(1991).Cronbach's alpha coefficients for above measures were from 0.85 to 0.95,indicating acceptable measurement reliabilities.Hierarchical Regression Modeling(HRM)was employed to analyze the data.Results show that:in the Chinese organizational context,trust in supervisor mediates the relationship between abusive supervision and employee performance,demonstrating that social exchange is a unique angle for explaining how abusive supervision leads to negative employee outcomes.Comparing to non-traditional ones,traditional employees will more likely comply with abusive supervisors.They will respond less distrust in abusive supervisors.This finding could,to a large extent,offer insights why abusive supervisor is prevailing in Chinese organizations.

Abusive Supervisors And Employee Work-To-Family Conflict In Chinese Construction Projects: How Does Family Support Help?

Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision

Do Family Affairs Matter? Work–Family Conflict and Safety Behavior of Construction Workers

Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Workers' Well-Being in Construction Projects: Effects of Guanxi Closeness and Trust in Managers

Does a Family-Supportive Supervisor Reduce the Effect of Work-Family Conflict on Emotional Exhaustion and Turnover Intentions? A Moderated Mediation Model

Job Burnout, Work-Family Conflict and Project Performance for Construction Professionals: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support

The influence of work-family conflict on social worker job satisfaction

Linking Frontline Construction Workers' Perceived Abusive Supervision to Work Engagement: Job Insecurity As the Game-Changing Mediation and Job Alternative As a Moderator

Work-family Conflict, Emotional Exhaustion, and Displaced Aggression Toward Others: the Moderating Roles of Workplace Interpersonal Conflict and Perceived Managerial Family Support.

Work-Family Conflict, Burnout, and Turnover Intention among Chinese Social Workers: The Moderating Role of Work Support

Abusive Supervision and Employee Performance: Mechanisms of Traditionality and Trust

Is Abusive Supervision Harmful to Organizational Environmental Performance? Evidence from China

The Effect of Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours on Employee Psychological Distress: The Role of Leader Workaholism and Work-to-Family Conflict

Why Abusive Supervision Impacts Employee Ocb And Cwb: A Meta-Analytic Review Of Competing Mediating Mechanisms

How Does Abusive Supervision Affect Subordinate's Counterproductive Work Behavior? A Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory

A Closer Look at How and when Family-Supportive Supervision Influence Work Interference with Family: the Roles of Family-Role Overload and Task Crafting

How work–family conflict affects employees' well-being in Chinese hotels: the moderating effects of Spouses' work–family conflict and gender

The effect of abusive supervision variability on work–family conflict: The role of psychological detachment and optimism

How to Cope with an Abusive Leader? Examinations of Subordinates’ Affective Reactions, CWB-O and Turnover Intentions

Work-Family Conflict in Construction Workers in First Tier Cities: A Cross-Sectional Study in Beijing City

Feeling Pressured Yet to Be Family-Supportive: Understanding the Costs at Work and Family