Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.

DEA Altruism and Exclusiveness Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Models

Alternative Secondary Goals in DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation

Extended Secondary Goal Models for Weights Selection in DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation.

Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

Extended Models To Non-Uniqueness Of Cross Efficiency In Cross Efficiency Evaluation

A secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: A “one home run is much better than two doubles” criterion

Cross-efficiency Evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis Based on the Perspective of Fairness Utility.

DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Based on Pareto Improvement

DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Based on Satisfaction Degree: an Application to Technology Selection

DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Good Relationship

Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method with Compete-Cooperate Matrix

Determination of Cross-Efficiency under the Principle of Rank Priority in Cross-Evaluation

Cross-efficiency Evaluation Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Decision Making Units

Extended Secondary Goal Approach for Common Equilibrium Efficient Frontier Selection in DEA with Fixed-Sum Outputs

A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model

DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

Two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory

DEA Cross-Efficiency Ranking Method Considering Satisfaction and Consensus Degree

The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points