A Robust Adaptive Linear Parameter-Varying Gain-Scheduling Controller for Aeroengines
Zhidan Liu,Yingzhi Huang,Linfeng Gou,Ding Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108319
IF: 5.457
2023-01-01
Aerospace Science and Technology
Abstract:This paper presents an on-board model-based adaptive linear parameter-varying (LPV) gain-scheduling controller for aeroengines exhibiting strong nonlinearity, uncertainty, and component performance degradation. A novel hybrid on-board adaptive model is proposed using a dual-loop (fast-slow) structure, which consists of an adaptive LPV model as the fast loop to guarantee the on-board performance, and a component-level model as the slow loop to provide accurate model information at a slow update frequency, without violating the real-time requirement of the fast loop. An innovative mixed adaptive extended Kalman filter is designed to estimate and update the model, by introducing an extended-Kalman-filter-based covariance scaling mechanism and updating the system noise covariance matrix by employing full covariance estimation. The component-level adaptive nonlinear model and mixed adaptive extended Kalman filter increase the accuracy of the on-board model, while the adaptive LPV model enhances its real-time performance. Finally, a robust polytopic adaptive LPV gain-scheduling controller is designed based on the adaptive LPV model by introducing a new scheduling variable, i.e., health parameters estimated by the on-board adaptive model. The proposed adaptive model and controller are implemented to a high fidelity nonlinear aeroengine model. Simulation results demonstrate that the estimation error of health parameters and component degradation level of the proposed method is 0.0763%, which gives an order of magnitude higher health parameter and component degradation level estimation accuracy compared with the other commonly applied models. The proposed model-based adaptive LPV gain scheduling control scheme has a steady-state error of 0.0028%, gives one order of magnitude higher control accuracy than that of three state-of-the-art baseline controllers while demonstrating significantly reduced overshoot and adjustment time. This verifies the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed controller, and verifies that the model can meet the technical requirements of the engine control system and significantly improve the engine control performance.