The Politics of Academic Innovation: A Cross-National Study of the Effects of Regime Type on Knowledge Production

Yi Yang,Lin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1815066
2020-01-01
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation
Abstract:Academic innovation is key to a country's international competitiveness and national well-being, and therefore explore its drivers is important. This paper tests a neglected driver - regime type - on how it affects academic innovation in 92 countries. Cross-national evidence of the effects of democracies and autocracies on scholarly production is lacking but much needed, especially when autocracies like China have overtaken the democratic United States for the number of scientific publications produced. For our independent variable, we use data from the Polity Project to measure the democratic level of a regime, backed by datasets from the Freedom House and the Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem). Unlike the existing literature that focuses on academic outputs by quantity and on science subjects alone, our dependent variables measure research outputs using the Scopus data and the Essential Science Indicators, which sort academic innovation by both quantity and quality measures for all disciplines. We find higher scholarly productivity and creativity, manifested as larger output quantity with higher citation rates per documents and greater H-index figures for quality and impact, are positively associated with a regime's democratic level. Why do democracies enable better innovation? We utilise the V-Dem dataset to suggest that academic freedom is a crucial cause.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?