Abstract:Problem definition: In this paper, we explore how a firm's concern about profit distribution and the size of downstream firms in supply chains affect corporate social responsibility (CSR) investment strategy. Methodology/results: In a supply chain consisting of one supplier and one manufacturer, both players decide whether to invest to reduce CSR violations, and they negotiate over a wholesale price. Distributive comparison behavior makes the manufacturer compare the profit with his equitable payoff, which is determined by the supplier's profit. Advantageous (resp. disadvantageous) inequality occurs when the manufacturer's profit is higher (resp. lower) than the manufacturer's equitable payoff. We compare this supply chain to the one without distributive comparison behavior. We find that when advantageous inequality occurs, or when neither inequality occurs and the manufacturer's sensitivity to the supplier's profit is low, the manufacturer's distributive comparison behavior makes the manufacturer less (resp. supplier more) likely to invest in CSR, which we call negative (resp. positive) impacts of distributive comparison behavior; otherwise, it makes the manufacturer more (resp. supplier less) likely to invest. In most cases, the weak bargaining power of the small manufacturer leads to larger positive or smaller negative impacts of distributive comparison behavior. Also, the low efficiency of the small manufacturer to reduce CSR violations leads to smaller negative impacts of distributive comparison behavior. Managerial implications: Our results show that governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) should investigate firms' distributive comparison behavior in supply chains. When downstream firms show the aversion to lower (resp. higher) profits than ones from upstream firms, the measures to monitor and support upstream (resp. downstream) firms' CSR investments should be taken to avoid CSR violations. In the supply chains with small downstream firms, extra efforts should be made to induce firms' distributive comparison behavior.

Do Social Connections Mitigate Hold-Up and Facilitate Cooperation? Evidence from Supply Chain Relationships

Do Social Connections Mitigate Hold-up? Evidence from Relation-Specific Investment and Innovation in Vertical Relationships

Innovation, Social Connections, and the Boundary of the Firm

It’s more complicated than we think: The implications of social capital on innovation

Socially Connected Supply Chains

The Impact of Informal Social Interaction on Innovation Capability in the Context of Buyer-Supplier Dyads

A Study of Effects of Supply Chain Relationship Capital on Cooperation Performance under Global Sourcing Circumstances

Social Embeddedness and Supply Chains: Doing Business with Friends Versus Making Friends in Business

Does common institutional ownership mitigate hold‐up problems along the supply chain?

Is Being Connected to Leaders Always Beneficial? Instrumental Interaction and the Development of Social Capital Within Organisational Networks

Friends along Supply Chain and Relationship-Specific Investments

To See from Where You Stand: Supply Chain Network Positions and Merger and Acquisition Likelihood

The impact of supply chain social capital on supply chain performance: a longitudinal analysis

Impacts of Distributive Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Small Firms

Supplier–supplier Coopetition and Buyer Innovation: a Perspective of Learning and Competitive Tension Within the Focal Buyer's Supplier Network

Benefits and Pitfalls of Social Capital for Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

Action-dependent Commitment in Vertical Collaborations: the Effect of Demand-Creating Innovations in a Supply Chain

Social interdependencies as facilitators of cooperative learning in new product development: The moderating effect of technological novelty

Supply chain network structures and firm financial performance: the moderating role of international relations

Social connections and innovation in diversified conglomerates

Supply Chain Relationships for Customer Satisfaction in China: Interdependence and Cooperative Goals