Abstract:Quantifying uncertainty in modeling and simulation is crucial since the parameters of the physical system are inherently non-deterministic and knowledge of the system embodied in the model is incomplete or inadequate. The most well-developed nonadditive-measure theory – the DempsterShafer theory of evidence – is explored for uncertainty quantification and propagation. For “uncertainty quantification,” we propose the MinMax method to construct belief functions to represent uncertainty in the information (data set) involving the inseparably mixed type of uncertainties. Using the principle of minimum uncertainty and the concepts of entropy and specificity, the MinMax method specifies a partition of a finite interval on the real line and assigns belief masses to the uniform subintervals. The method is illustrated in a simple example and applied to the total uncertainty quantification in flight plan of two actual flights. For “uncertainty propagation,” we construct belief/probability density functions for the output or the statistics of the output given the belief/probability density functions for the uncertain input variables. Different approaches are introduced for aleatory uncertainty propagation, epistemic uncertainty propagation, and mixed type of uncertainty propagation. The impact of the uncertain input parameters on the model output is studied using these approaches in a simple example of aerodynamic flow: quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow. In the situation that multiple models are available for the same quantity of interest, the combination rules in the Dempster-Shafer theory can be utilized to integrate the predictions from the different models. In the present work, we propose a robust and comprehensive procedure to combine multiple bodies of evidence. It is robust in that it can combine multiple bodies of evidence, consistent or otherwise. It is comprehensive in the sense that it examines the bodies of evidence strongly conflicted with others, reconstructs the basic belief mass functions by discounting, and then fuses all the bodies of evidence using an optimally parametrized combination rule. The proposed combination procedure is applied to radiotherapy dose response outcome analysis.

Constructing Belief Functions Using the Principle of Minimum Uncertainty

A Modified Belief Entropy in Dempster-Shafer Framework

An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making

Belief Function to Probability: A Tradeoff Between Easy Decision-Making and High Risk

Uncertainty Quantification and Data Fusion Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory

An Improved Measure for Belief Structure in the Evidence Theory.

Analyzing the Monotonicity of Belief Interval Based Uncertainty Measures in Belief Function Theory.

Combination of interval-valued belief structures based on belief entropy

Generalized Belief Function: A new concept for uncertainty modelling and processing

On the Negation of a Dempster-Shafer Belief Structure Based on Maximum Uncertainty Allocation

An Improved Belief Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Basic Probability Assignments Based on Deng Entropy and Belief Interval

A Novel Decision Probability Transformation Method Based on Belief Interval.

A New Belief Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Basic Probability Assignments Based on Belief Function and Plausibility Function

Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts

Plausibility Entropy: A New Total Uncertainty Measure in Evidence Theory Based on Plausibility Function.

An Improved Belief Entropy in Evidence Theory

Hierarchical DSmP Transformation for Decision-Making under Uncertainty

Generalization of Dempster-Shafer theory: A complex belief function

A Method Of Probability Transformation Based On The Assignable Certainty

Conflicting evidence combination of interval-valued belief structures

A New Distance-Based Total Uncertainty Measure in the Theory of Belief Functions