Abstract:Abstract How humans connect with nature impacts the well‐being of both people and ecosystems. Being disconnected from nature can lead to attitudes and behaviours that ultimately damage our physical and mental health and cause irreparable harm to the planet. To measure the human‐nature connection, measurements with good psychometric properties are warranted. By synthesizing the existing instruments, we suggested the distinctive advantages of the Extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale (EINS), such as using multiple graphical spatial metaphors. Based on the back‐translation method, we translated the EINS into a Chinese version (EINS‐C). Then, using the Rasch model and the classical test theory, we elaborately examined the psychometric properties of the scale with a sample of 786 Chinese adults. Exploratory factor analysis, principal components analysis of Rasch residuals, and confirmative factor analysis together provided robust evidence for the one‐factor structure of the EINS‐C. Category probability curves showed the satisfying functioning of the rating scale. The scale further exhibited high criterion validity, convergent validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Rasch model fit statistics were also substantial for items. Each item presented a moderate difficulty, suggesting high discrimination power for levels of self‐nature connection. Scores on the scale could be meaningfully compared across genders, as no substantial differential item functioning was found. The EINS‐C consequently demonstrated generally robust psychometric properties, which could be applied to the Chinese‐speaking community, approximately 16 per cent of the world's population. This high‐quality and convenient tool for evaluating and monitoring the relationship between humans and nature lays a foundation for and might facilitate conservation‐related research and policy formulation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Measuring Environmental Concern Through International Surveys: A Study of Cross-Cultural Equivalence with Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Psychometric Evaluation of the Extended Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale in Chinese Adults Through the Rasch Analysis

Environmental Concern Scales:Reliability,Validity and Application

Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence in Mainland China

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

The Chinese Version of the EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-Being: Testing Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance

Cross-Cultural Validation of A Revised Environmental Identity Scale

Environmental Attitude in the 28 Member States of the European Union: Cross-Cultural Comparisons Grounded in Incommensurable Measurement Instruments

An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Consultation Self-Efficacy Scale in Taiwan

Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis

Comparing Chinese Youth with American Youth on Adjustment: an Illustration of Measurement Issues in Cross-Cultural Research

Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of Scales Assessing Stigma and Attitude to Seeking Professional Psychological Help

Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the General Self Efficacy Scale across Gender and Cultures

Measuring Chinese Negative Emotion Towards Climate Change: Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Climate Change Anxiety Scale

Development and psychometric validation of a brief scale to measure environmental perception based on the 2-major environmental values model in adolescents and adults

Effective scale for consumers’ environmental concerns: A competing scales study between NEP and ECCB

Development and Validation of an Eating-Related Eco-Concern Questionnaire

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Core Self-Evaluations Scale

Validation and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the academic self-efficacy scale for university students

Constructing a Model for Measuring Environmental Concern:Based on the 2003 CGSS Dataset

W. Schultz Environmental Concern Scale: Adaptation and Validation