Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment

Caroline Wright,Philippa Williams,Olga Elizarova,Jennifer Dahne,Jiang Bian,Yunpeng Zhao,Andy S. L. Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045445
IF: 3.006
2021-01-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives To assess the effect of exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms found on Twitter on adult current smokers' intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with regular cigarettes. Setting An online randomised controlled experiment conducted in November 2019 among USA and UK current smokers. Participants 2400 adult current smokers aged >= 18 years who were not current e-cigarette users recruited from an online panel. Participants' were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio using a least-fill randomiser function. Interventions Viewing 4 tweets in random order within one of four conditions: (1) e-cigarettes are just as or more harmful than smoking, (2) e-cigarettes are completely harmless, (3) e-cigarette harms are uncertain, and (4) a control condition of tweets about physical activity. Primary outcomes measures Self-reported post-test intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes, and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with smoking. Results Among US and UK participants, after controlling for baseline measures of the outcome, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are as or more harmful than smoking versus control was associated with lower posttest intention to purchase e-cigarettes (beta=-0.339, 95% CI -0.487 to -0.191, p<0.001) and increased posttest perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (beta=0.341, 95% CI 0.273 to 0.410, p<0.001). Among US smokers, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless was associated with higher post-test intention to purchase e-cigarettes (beta=0.229, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.456, p=0.048) and lower post-test perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (beta=-0.154, 95% CI -0.258 to -0.050, p=0.004). Conclusions US and UK adult current smokers may be deterred from considering using e-cigarettes after brief exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes were just as or more harmful than smoking. Conversely, US adult current smokers may be encouraged to use e-cigarettes after exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless. These findings suggest that misinformation about e-cigarette harms may influence some adult smokers' decisions to consider using e-cigarettes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?