Spatiotemporal mobility network of global scientists, 1970–2020
Tianyu Liu Tao Pei Zidong Fang Mingbo Wu Xiaohan Liu Xiaorui Yan Ci Song Jingyu Jiang Linfeng Jiang Jie Chen a State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,Chinab University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,Chinac Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing,Chinad School of Geography and Ocean Science,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Chinae College of Earth and Environmental Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,ChinaTianyu Liu is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. His research interests include scientific mobility,complex networks,and geographical flows. He contributed to the research design,methodology,visualization,result analysis,and writing of the manuscript.Tao Pei is a professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. His research interests focus on the theoretical and practical research on geographical flows in a big geodata perspective. He contributed to the research design,experimental guidance,as well as reviewing and editing of the manuscript.Zidong Fang is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. Her research interests focus on the modeling of geographical flows. She contributed to the visualization,result analysis,and writing of the manuscript.Mingbo Wu is a postdoc at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. His research interests include spatial driver analysis. He contributed to the experimental modeling and result analysis.Xiaohan Liu is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. Her research interests include urban mobility and health risk assessment. She contributed to the data acquisition,result analysis,and writing of the manuscript.Xiaorui Yan is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. Her research interests include the modeling and applications of geographical flows. She contributed to the data acquisition,result analysis,and writing of the manuscript.Ci Song is an associate professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. His research interests focus on the modeling of geographical flows. He contributed to the research design and experimental guidance.Jingyu Jiang is a joint training student at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS and Nanjing University. Her research interests focus on the modeling of geographical flows. She contributed to the data acquisition and methodology.Linfeng Jiang is a PhD candidate in the College of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Lanzhou University. His research interests include spatial location recognition. He contributed to the data acquisition and methodology.Jie Chen is an associate professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS. Her research interests focus on spatial data mining and analysis. She contributed to the research design and experimental guidance.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2369540
2024-06-26
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Abstract:The mobility of scientists, manifested by movements to new academic institutions, grows with globalization and plays a crucial role in individual careers, institutional productivity, and knowledge dissemination. Current research on scientists' mobility focuses on aggregated levels such as inter-country mobility, with little attention paid to fine-grained institutional level, leading to a simplified spatial portrayal of the mobility. To fill the gap, we take scientists in geography as examples, and reconstructed their dynamic mobility network among institutions from 1970 to 2020 based on massive literature metadata. Our findings reveal the spatial mobility pattern that is now dominated by North America, Western and Northern Europe, East Asia, and Oceania, with the trend of intensification, multipolarity, and inequality over time. Specifically, the mobility network exhibits clear community structure largely constrained by spatial proximity and national borders. We also uncovered a universal downward mobility pattern embedded in the hierarchical structure. Our quantitative analysis further suggest that mobility is facilitated by multiple realities, including spatial, cultural, and scientific proximity, institutional rankings and national economic levels, cooperation, and visa-free policies, with varying dynamics. These results contribute to spatiotemporal insights into the mechanisms of scientific development in theory, and the basis for talent policymaking in practice.
geography, physical,computer science, information systems,information science & library science