Vertical integration of competing supply chain under the condition of R&D motivation
Xiao-jing LI,Xing-zheng AI,Xiao-wo TANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2018.02.017
2018-01-01
Abstract:We investigate vertical integration of two competing supply chains,each consisting of a manufacturer,a supplier,and a retailer.The supplier offers components to its manufacturers and make effort to lower cost through R&D motivation.The manufacturer is engaged in product manufacturing.The retailer orders products from manufacturer and resell products to market.More prior papers focus on the two-tier supply chain and discuss only the forward integration for manufacturers.Different from them,we analyze strategic behaviors of supply chain players in a three-tier supply chain and consider that each manufacturer has one of the three strategies to choose:decentralization,forward integration,or backward integration.Therefore,there are six possible configurations:NN,SS,RI,SN,RN,SR.where N denotes no integration,S denotes backward integration,and R denotes forward integration.We study the effect of vertical integration on cost,product price,and profitability,and identify a subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium of the competing supply chains.We find that:(i) When one of manufacturers is not vertically integrated,the other manufacturers' forward integration strategy mainly depends on the intensity of competition between the two chains.Backward integration strategy relies heavily on innovation investment cost coefficient.In addition,two kinds of integration choice (i.e.,forward integration and backward integration) only depend on the innovation investment cost coefficient.(ii) When one of manufacturers chooses forward integration or backward integration,the integration strategy is more valuable to the other manufacturers than no integration strategy.For two kinds of integration choice,if innovation investment cost coefficient is low,the other manufacturers prefers backward integration strategy.If the innovation investment cost coefficient is high,the other manufacturers prefer forward integration strategy.(iii) In addition,the dynamic integration process of manufacturers is not only related with the innovation of investment cost coefficient,but also affected by the intensity of competition between the two chains.That is,when the intensity of competition is not strong,and if innovation investment cost coefficient is low,backward integration strategy is the dominant equilibrium.If the innovation investment cost coefficient is high,forward integration strategy is a unique and dominant equilibrium.When the two chains competition and innovation investment cost coefficient are relatively high,decentralization strategy is the best option for both manufacturers.(iv) At last,the cost-saving by technological innovation is increasing with the number of supply chains with vertical integration.The retail price is decreasing with the number of supply chains with vertical integration.In another word,integration strategy helps reduce cost and retail price.