Abstract:Developing agricultural socialized services is of great significance for promoting agricultural sustainable development and ensuring food security. The use of the Internet provides new opportunities to promote the development of agricultural socialized services. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2016 and 2018 with 8850 observations, this paper investigates the effects of Internet use on farmers’ adoption decision and adoption degree of agricultural socialized services, and explores the mediating effect of social networks. The adoption of agricultural socialized services is divided into adoption decision and adoption degree, and the Probit model and Tobit model are used for empirical analysis. The results showed that: (1) Internet use has a significant positive impact on both the adoption decision and the adoption degree of agricultural socialized services. Specifically, the impact of Internet use on the adoption decision and adoption degree of agricultural machinery services is greater than that of agricultural hired labor services. (2) The mechanism analysis found that social networks partially mediated the effect of Internet use on farmers’ adoption decision and adoption degree of agricultural socialized services. Furthermore, social networks have a greater mediating effect on the influence of Internet use on farmers’ adoption decision and adoption degree of agricultural machinery services compared to agricultural hired labor services. (3) The heterogeneity test found that Internet use has no significant impact on the adoption of agricultural socialized services by older farmers and farmers with a low education level. Therefore, it is crucial to fully leverage the potential of the Internet to facilitate the supply and demand of agricultural socialized services. Moreover, it is essential to integrate the market of agricultural socialized services with the rural social network to realize the synergy of “Internet plus social network”. This integration facilitates the organic connection between small farmers and modern agricultural development.

Internet Use, Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Rural Incomes: Evidence from China

Are vulnerable farmers more easily influenced? Heterogeneous effects of Internet use on the adoption of integrated pest management

The Impact of Internet Use on Entrepreneurial Behavior and Income: Evidence from Chinese Rural Households

Can Internet Use Increase Rural Women’s Income? Evidence from Underdeveloped Areas of China

Do Farmers Gain Internet Dividends from E-commerce Adoption? Evidence from China

Impact of Internet Use on Economic Well‐being of Rural Households: Evidence from China

Does Internet use promote the adoption of agricultural technology? Evidence from 1 449 farm households in 14 Chinese provinces

The effect of internet usage on perceptions of social fairness: Evidence from rural China

Internet use and land transfer in: empirical evidence from China's rural panel data

The effect of Internet usage on dietary quality: Evidence from rural China

Does Internet Use Help Reduce Rural Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from China

Internet Use and Land Transfer In: Empirical Evidence from China’s Rural Panel Data

Research on the impact of internet use on fertilizer and pesticide inputs: Empirical evidence from China

The Impact of Internet Use on Land Productivity: Evidence from China Land Economy Survey

Research on the Impact of Internet Use on Farmers’ Adoption of Agricultural Socialized Services

Internet Access and Irrigation Adoption in China

EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF INTERNET USAGE ON THE URBAN RURAL INCOME GAP: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

Impacts of Internet Access and Use on Grain Productivity: Evidence from Central China

The role of rural internet adoption in shaping consumption breadth and inequality: evidence from the Chinese Social Survey

How internet access impacts rural households' income in China: evidence from the China family panel survey

Examining How Internet Use and Non-Farm Employment Affect Rural Households’ Income Gap? Evidence from China