Abstract:This paper investigates the rationality of large language models (LLMs) in strategic decision-making contexts, specifically within the framework of game theory. We evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs across a spectrum of complete-information and incomplete-information games. Our findings reveal that LLMs frequently deviate from rational strategies, particularly as the complexity of the game increases with larger payoff matrices or deeper sequential trees. To address these limitations, we design multiple game-theoretic workflows that guide the reasoning and decision-making processes of LLMs. These workflows aim to enhance the models' ability to compute Nash Equilibria and make rational choices, even under conditions of uncertainty and incomplete information. Experimental results demonstrate that the adoption of these workflows significantly improves the rationality and robustness of LLMs in game-theoretic tasks. Specifically, with the workflow, LLMs exhibit marked improvements in identifying optimal strategies, achieving near-optimal allocations in negotiation scenarios, and reducing susceptibility to exploitation during negotiations. Furthermore, we explore the meta-strategic considerations of whether it is rational for agents to adopt such workflows, recognizing that the decision to use or forgo the workflow constitutes a game-theoretic issue in itself. Our research contributes to a deeper understanding of LLMs' decision-making capabilities in strategic contexts and provides insights into enhancing their rationality through structured workflows. The findings have implications for the development of more robust and strategically sound AI agents capable of navigating complex interactive environments. Code and data supporting this study are available at \url{<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/Wenyueh/game_theory" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>}.

Using EGDL to Represent Domain Knowledge for Imperfect Information Automated Negotiations

Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Games

How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysis

GNOME: Generating Negotiations through Open-Domain Mapping of Exchanges

DialoGraph: Incorporating Interpretable Strategy-Graph Networks into Negotiation Dialogues

The Complex Negotiation Dialogue Game

Negotiating with LLMS: Prompt Hacks, Skill Gaps, and Reasoning Deficits

Richelieu: Self-Evolving LLM-Based Agents for AI Diplomacy

Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Method

Negotiations with Incomplete Information

Mechanisms for Automated Negotiation in State Oriented Domains

Evaluating and Enhancing LLMs Agent based on Theory of Mind in Guandan: A Multi-Player Cooperative Game under Imperfect Information

Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues

A Model Of Deceit-Tolerant Automated Negotiation For Open Environment

Negotiation and honesty in artificial intelligence methods for the board game of Diplomacy

Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialogues

A Fairness-Driven Method for Learning Human-Compatible Negotiation Strategies

Evaluating Language Model Agency through Negotiations

It Takes Two to Negotiate: Modeling Social Exchange in Online Multiplayer Games

Digital Good Exchange: (extended Abstract).