Development Strategy, Transition and Challenges of Development in Lagging Regions
Justin Yifu Lin,Mingxing Liu
2004-01-01
Abstract:Following World War II, many developing countries adopted various measures to industrialize their economies, hoping to accelerate the process of catching up with the industrial countries. However, except for a small number of economies in East Asia, the gap between the developing countries and the industrial countries has increased. Recent studies find that the poor development performance in the developing countries is largely attributable to their problems in relation to institutions, including all kinds of market distortions and government interventions. Most developing countries, both socialist and nonsocialist, started to reform their institutions in the early 1980s. Nevertheless, the growth performance of most developing countries has deteriorated further. We argue that the poor growth performance and many institutional distortions in the developing countries following World War II can be largely explained by their adoption of an inappropriate development strategy. Motivated by nation building, most developing countries, including the socialist countries, adopted a comparative advantage defying (CAD) strategy to accelerate the growth of capital-intensive, advanced sectors in their countries. Many firms in those priority sectors were nonviable in open, competitive markets because of the violation of their economies' comparative advantages. To implement a CAD strategy, governments in the developing countries adopted a series of distortions in input and output markets to subsidize and/or protect the nonviable firms or both, resulting in rent-seeking, soft-budget constraints, macroeconomic instability, and income disparities. Economic stagnation, or even sudden collapse, became unavoidable, prompting the developing countries, voluntarily or involuntarily, to embark on market-oriented reforms. The implementation of market-oriented reforms without first addressing the issue of firms' viability might result in widespread bankruptcies, unemployment, and social and political instability. For fear of such consequences, many governments found other disguised ways to protect and subsidize nonviable firms after implementing reforms. As a result, not only could they not achieve the transition to a well-functioning market economy, but also their economic performance became poorer than that before the reforms. When reform starts, governments should liberalize entry into the labor-intensive sectors, which were previously repressed, and address the viability issue of those firms in sectors targeted by the CAD strategy. In this way, the economy can achieve dynamic growth during its transition. This paper tests several hypotheses about the impacts of development strategy and the transition approach on economic Performance using macroeconomic data from 103 countries for 1962-99. The results are consistent with the hypotheses: a CAD strategy is detrimental to long-term growth and causes economic growth to be volatile, and the growth of labor-intensive sectors is conducive to overall economic growth during the transition.