Comparisons Among Multi-model Ensemble Based on Different Ensemble Methods and Ensemble Member Sizes

Wenjie Dong,Jianbin Huang,Yan Guo,Fumin Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48444-9_3
2016-01-01
Abstract:In this chapter, the results of three different multi-model ensemble mean methods are compared. In Sect. 3.1, the global mean surface air temperature and precipitation from multi-model weighted mean and equal-weighted mean are compared. The weight is given according to the correlation coefficients and relative bias between model and observation. The results from the multi-model weighted mean and the equal-weighted mean show no significant difference. In Sect. 3.2, the surface air temperature and precipitation in China from multi-model equal-weighted mean and Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method are compared. BMA is a multi-model ensemble method which considered each model's posterior distributions and then weighted by posterior model probability. In our calculation, the training of BMA is based on observational data (derived from CRUTS 3.21) for the period of 1961-1990. The multi-model ensemble mean in Sects. 3.1 and 3.2 is calculated based on 22 CMIP5 models described in Chap. 1. In Sect. 3.3, the global mean surface air temperature and precipitation simulated by equal-weighted ensemble mean of 8 (analyzed in another Atlas (Dong WJ et al, The atlas of climate change: based on SEAP-CMIP5. Springer. doi: 10.1007/9783-642-31773-6, 2013)) and 22 CMIP5 models are compared with the results from IPCC AR5 (Collins M et al., Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF et al., (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 2013; Flato G et al., Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker TF et al., (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 2013). The ensemble of the 22 CMIP5 models show better performance than that of 8 models and is similar with that of IPCC AR5.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?