Abstract:Earlier research studies on public-private partnership (PPP) indicated that an objective, reliable, and practical risk assessment model for PPP projects and an equitable risk allocation mechanism among different parties are crucial to the successful implementation of these PPP projects. However, actual empirical research works in this research area are limited. This paper reports the first stage of a research study, which aims to identify and assess the principal risks for the delivery of PPP projects in China and to address their proper risk allocation between the private and public sectors. An empirical questionnaire survey was designed to examine the relative importance of different risk factors and to analyze the allocation of risk factors to different parties in PPP projects. A total of 580 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 105 valid responses were obtained for data analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test is employed to investigate whether significant difference in perception existed first between the private and public sectors and second between industrial practitioners and academics in China. The empirical findings show that the three most important risk factors for PPP projects in China are (1) government intervention; (2) government corruption; and (3) poor public decision-making processes. These findings reveal that the Chinese government intervention and corruption may be the major obstacles to the success of PPP projects in China. A major cause for these risks may be attributed to inefficient legislative and supervisory systems for PPP projects in China. After conducting the Mann-Whitney U test on the 105 survey respondents, the empirical findings indicate that the perceptions of all 34 risk factors in China between the private and public sectors were not significantly different. Similarly, there were no significant differences between academics and industrial practitioners except that the former perceived the problem of government corruption to be more severe than did the latter. For risk allocation, the empirical results indicate that the public and private sectors were in general consensus with most of the risks identified. The major risks that the public sector preferred to accept are within the systematic risk category, especially political, legal, and social risks. The private sector preferred to retain the principal risks within the specific project risk category, especially construction, operation, and relationship risks, in addition to economic risks within systematic risk category. The remaining risk, environment risk, is preferred to be shared between the two sectors. This research study enables international construction companies to better understand how risks should be assessed and allocated for PPP projects in China. It also assists in risk response planning and control for future PPP projects in China. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

An empirical research on the relationship between trust and collaboration effects of PPP in high-tech biological pharmaceutical industry

An Empirical Research On The Relationship Between Partner'S Reputation And Collaboration Effects In Ppp-Accommodation Function Of Formal Contract And Trust Relationship

When does trust influence coopeartion effects in public-priavte partnerships?

WHEN DOES TRUST INFLUENCE COOPERATION EFFECTS IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS?

A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Allocation of Control Rights and Its Influence towards the Cooperation Efficiency in PPP——Exemplified by PPPs in China's medical and health fields

Allocation of Control Rights and Cooperation Efficiency in Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Evidence from the Chinese Pharmaceutical Industry

Prior Ties, Shared Values and Cooperation in Public–Private Partnerships

Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of Value Creation in Public–Private Partnership Projects Under Dynamic Trust

A Study of the Cooperative Involvement and Cooperative Embedment and Its Influence of the Cooperation Efficiency: an Example from the PPPs in the Medical and Health Fields

The public-private partnerships in healthcare sector in China

Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China

A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation

Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China

Procedural fairness and cooperation in public-private partnerships in China

Configuration analysis of asymmetric trust between infrastructure PPP project participants

When does a partner’s reputation impact cooperation effects in partnerships?

Investigating the Driving Factors of Public Participation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects—A Case Study of China

Institutional Environment, Institutional Arrangements, and Risk Identification and Allocation in Public–Private Partnerships: A Multilevel Model Analysis Based on Data from 31 Provinces in China

The PEST-SWOT Analysis of Private Enterprises Delivering Hospital PPP in China

Research on the Influences of Task Interdependence on Team Performance in the Context of the Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation in the Public–Private Partnership Projects

A Experimental Study on Allocation of Control Rights in PPPs