Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture risk around a cemented polished taper-slip stem using an osteoporotic composite bone model
Sameer Jain,Jonathan N Lamb,Ruth Drake,Ian Entwistle,James P Baren,Zachary Thompson,Andrew R Beadling,Michael G Bryant,Farag Shuweihdi,Hemant Pandit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231225172
2024-01-20
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Abstract:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Ahead of Print. This biomechanical study aimed to determine if variations in stem material, stem geometry, stem offset and cement viscosity affect mechanical resistance to postoperative periprosthetic fracture (PFF) after hip arthroplasty with a commonly used cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) stem (CPT, Zimmer Biomet) in a novel osteoporotic composite femoral bone model. Thirty-six osteoporotic composite femoral models were tested using a standardised in-vitro loading technique to simulate a typical PFF. Outcome measures were torque to failure (N), fracture energy (N/m2) and rotation to failure (°). Comparisons were made by stem material (cobalt chrome vs stainless steel), stem geometry (CPT stem vs Exeter stem), stem offset (standard offset vs extra extended offset) and cement viscosity (high viscosity vs low viscosity). Statistical comparisons were carried out with significance set at p 0.05). This is the first biomechanical study on mechanical resistance to PFF using osteoporotic composite bone models. For the CPT stem, it confirms that stem material, stem offset, stem geometry and cement viscosity do not affect mechanical resistance to PFF in an osteoporotic bone model.
engineering, biomedical