Abstract:HomePlant DiseaseVol. 104, No. 5First Report of Fruit Rot on ‘Cuiguan’ Pear Caused by Fusarium proliferatum in China PreviousNext DISEASE NOTES OPENOpen Access licenseFirst Report of Fruit Rot on ‘Cuiguan’ Pear Caused by Fusarium proliferatum in ChinaX. Y. Zhao, M. Chen, L. Y. Pan, Y. Q. Fu, J. Y. Chen, and M. L. XiangX. Y. ZhaoCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, M. ChenCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, L. Y. PanCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Y. Q. FuCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, J. Y. ChenCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaPingxiang University, Pingxiang, Jiangxi 337055, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and M. L. Xiang†Corresponding author: M. L. Xiang; E-mail Address: mlxiang2010@126.comhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-4811College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorAffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations X. Y. Zhao1 M. Chen1 L. Y. Pan1 Y. Q. Fu1 J. Y. Chen1 2 M. L. Xiang1 † 1College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Non-destructive Testing of Fruits & Vegetables, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, China 2Pingxiang University, Pingxiang, Jiangxi 337055, China Published Online:4 Mar 2020https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-19-0875-PDNAboutSectionsSupplemental ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat Cuiguan pear (Pyrus pyrifolia cv. ‘Cuiguan’) is an early ripening pear variety cultivated in southern China. In July 2018, an unknown disease occurred on 5 to 10% of 5,000 postharvest Cuiguan pear fruit (P. pyrifolia) after 15 days in our laboratory storage room (20°C, 85 to 90% relative humidity) in NanChang City (28.68° N, 115.85° E), Jiangxi Province. Initial symptoms were shallow black spots on the fruit surface that later enlarged into circular brown lesions with water-soaked margins and a lesion diameter of 20 to 40 mm. White hyphae grew on the pear lesions and, slowly, infected fruit became soft and necrotic. To isolate the suspected pathogen, small sections (5 × 3 mm) of diseased fruit were sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s followed by 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for 5 min, rinsed three times with sterile water, and then transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 28°C for 5 days. Finally, five isolates were obtained and purified on PDA. The isolates produced abundant aerial mycelium, which was initially white and then became purple over time at 28°C. The average growth of mycelium was 5.4 mm per day (n = 5). On carnation leaf agar (Fisher et al. 1982), macroconidia were three to five septa, moderately curved to straight, and 28.7 to 53.2 × 3.2 to 5.3 µm in size (38.4 × 4.2 µm on average, n = 25). On PDA, the microconidia were almost straight, aseptate, and 6.3 to 11.4 × 2.1 to 4.0 µm (8.3 × 2.9 µm on average, n = 25), and no chlamydospores were observed. The morphological features were consistent with Fusarium proliferatum (Leslie and Summerell 2006). In addition, molecular phylogenetic analyses were used to define the isolate identity. The universal primers ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and F. proliferatum-specific primers PRO1/PRO2 (Mulè et al. 2004) were used to amplify the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-5.8S ribosomal DNA region and calmodulin gene. The PCR amplicons (accession nos. MK158221 and MK144327) aligned with GenBank showed 100% similarity with F. proliferatum (accession nos. KU891521.1 and LT841258.1). Thus, the pathogen was identified as F. proliferatum based on morphological and molecular characteristics. Pathogenicity tests were conducted by inoculating nine disease-free pear fruit after disinfesting in 75% ethanol. A prepared spore suspension (10 μl, 1.0 × 106 spores/ml) was dropped on the wounds (a depth of 1 mm with a 1-mm diameter) on the pear surface, which were made by a sterilized needle. Sterile water (10 μl) was dropped on the wounded sites of nine pear fruits as negative controls, and 10 μl of a prepared spore suspension was dropped onto nine nonwounded control pears. All fruits were incubated in a growth chamber at 30/26°C (day/night, 12-h photoperiod, 90% relative humidity). After 3 days, the first symptom of shallow black spots was observed on nine wounded inoculated pears, and after 5 days mean lesion diameter was 19.8 mm, whereas the symptom of nonwounded pears was mild. The water controls remained healthy. To complete Koch’s postulates, F. proliferatum was again isolated from infected pears. To our knowledge, this is the first report of F. proliferatum causing rot on Cuiguan pear in China and around the world. This finding can alert agronomists to do more work, such as biological characteristics, pathogenesis, and control methods to study F. proliferatum.The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.References:Fisher, N. L., et al. 1982. Phytopathology 72:151. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-151 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarLeslie, J. F., and Summerell, B. A. 2006. Page 224 in: The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470278376 Crossref, Google ScholarMulè, G., et al. 2004. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110:495. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000032389.84048.71 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWhite, T. J., et al. 1990. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Crossref, Google ScholarThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.Funding: Funding was provided by Project of Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province (JXGS-03) and Project of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province of China (GJJ160355).DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 104, No. 5 May 2020SubscribeISSN:0191-2917e-ISSN:1943-7692 DownloadCaptionSymptoms observed in the field on zucchini plants caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae (A. Pérez-Hernández et al.). Photo credit: J. M. Gómez-Vázquez. Peach tree with excavated root collar (S. B. Miller et al.). Photo credit: G. Schnabel. Metrics Article History Issue Date: 3 May 2020Published: 4 Mar 2020First Look: 26 Dec 2019Accepted: 19 Dec 2019 Page: 1554 Information© 2020 The American Phytopathological SocietyFundingProject of Collaborative Innovation Center of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi ProvinceGrant/Award Number: JXGS-03Project of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province of ChinaGrant/Award Number: GJJ160355Keywordspearfruit rotpathogen identificationFusarium proliferatumThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.Cited byMycotoxin Production and the Relationship between Microbial Diversity and Mycotoxins in Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd cv. Huangguan Pear11 October 2022 | Toxins, Vol. 14, No. 10The First Report of Juglans regia Leaf Spot Caused by Fusarium proliferatum in ChinaZi-ye Wang, Yue Liu, Ai-hua Yan, and Zhi-gang Wang20 July 2022 | Plant Disease, Vol. 106, No. 8First Report of Lotus Seedpod Withering Caused by Fusarium proliferatum on Nelumbo nucifera Plants in ChinaLiang Cai, Xin Gong, Xinwen Zheng, Weigang Kuang, Liangbo Yang, Lianhu Zhang, Xiaotang Sun, Jian Ma, and Ruqiang Cui9 January 2022 | Plant Disease, Vol. 106, No. 1Dynamic Microbiome Changes Reveal the Effect of 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment on Reducing Post-harvest Fruit Decay in “Doyenne du Comice” Pear27 August 2021 | Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 12

Abstract:HomePlant DiseaseVol. 106, No. 8First Report of Collar Canker and Dieback of Camellia sinensis Caused by Fusarium solani Species Complex in Henan, China PreviousNext DISEASE NOTE OPENOpen Access licenseFirst Report of Collar Canker and Dieback of Camellia sinensis Caused by Fusarium solani Species Complex in Henan, ChinaWen Xu, Fenghua Zhao, Xiaoxu Deng, Paul H. Goodwin, Mingcong Xia, Jie Zhang, Runhong Sun, Juan Liang, Chao Wu, and Lirong YangWen Xuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-9714Institute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Fenghua ZhaoXinyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinyang, Henan, 464000, China, Xiaoxu DengInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Paul H. GoodwinSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada, Mingcong XiaInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Jie ZhangInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Runhong SunInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Juan LiangInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, Chao WuInstitute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China, and Lirong Yang†Corresponding author: L. Yang; E-mail Address: [email protected]https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-3214Institute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, ChinaAffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations Wen Xu1 Fenghua Zhao2 Xiaoxu Deng1 Paul H. Goodwin3 Mingcong Xia1 Jie Zhang1 Runhong Sun1 Juan Liang1 Chao Wu1 Lirong Yang1 † 1Institute of Plant Protection Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Crop Protection, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China 2Xinyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinyang, Henan, 464000, China 3School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Published Online:29 Jun 2022https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1517-PDNAboutSectionsView articlePDFSupplemental ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat View articleTea (Camellia sinensis) is a significant commercial crop in China. A collar canker and dieback disease of tea has recently been reported in Sri Lanka (Sinniah et al. 2017). In spring 2020, tea bushes with symptoms of fewer leaves, yellowing of leaves with cankers having cracks, and peeling of bark, premature falling in the early stage, and progressive dieback of branches followed by death of the whole tree that was partially covered with white-colored mold were observed in tea plantations over a 200-hm2 area in Xinyang, Henan Province, China. To determine the causative agent, dead stems with white-colored mold were collected, cut into small pieces, surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol, rinsed twice with sterile distilled water, and then air-dried. The pieces were placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 28°C for 7 days. A total of 19 fungal colonies were isolated and transferred to fresh PDA. Single-spore isolates were made for each, and they were all observed to produce white flocculent mycelium with the reverse side being pale yellow on PDA. The appearance of a representative strain, XYWLD-07, on PDA is shown in the supplementary materials. Macroconidia (14.26 to 42.13 × 3.53 to 6.79 μm) and microconidia (6.93 to 11.85 × 2.72 to 6.33 μm) were observed in the cultures. The genomic DNA from representative strain XYWLD-07 was extracted, and the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of ribosomal DNA, beta-tubulin, translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF-1α), RNA polymerase I beta subunit (RPB1), and RNA polymerase II beta subunit (RPB2) genes were amplified using the primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′/5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) (Gardes and Bruns 1993), Bt-F/Bt-R (5′-AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT-3′/5′-TCTGGATGTTGTTGGGAATCC-3′), EF-1/EF-2 (5′-ATGGGTAAGGARGACAAGAC-3′/5′-GGARGTACCAGTSATCATGTT-3′), RPB-1F/1R (5′-TTTTCCTCACAAAGGAGCAAATCATG-3′/5′-GTTCACCCAAGATATGGTCGAAAGCC-3′), and RPB2-5F2/11aR (5′-GGGGWGAYCAGAAGAAGGC-3′/5′-GCRTGGATCTTRTCRTCSACC-3′) (O'Donnell et al. 2010), respectively. The PCR products were sequenced and deposited in GenBank (accession nos. MZ411431, MZ439920, OL982608, OM069738, and OM265212, respectively). BLASTn against NCBI nr and Fusarium-ID database revealed that the ITS sequence had 99.65% homology with BLAST sequences of Fusarium solani (GenBank accession nos. JN882257.1 and JN882255.1), the beta tubulin sequence had 96.92% similarity with BLAST sequences of F. solani (KU983876.1 and MN692929.1), TEF- 1α gene sequence had 99.15 and 99.29% homology with BLAST sequences of F. solani (KM096405.1 and KM096409.1), RPB1 gene sequence had 99.32 and 99.41% homology with BLAST sequences of F. solani (KU974331.1 and MT305119.1), and RPB2 gene sequence had 98.15 and 98.20% homology with BLAST sequences of F. solani (MT305182.1 and MT305177.1). Furthermore, TEF-1α, RPB1, and RPB2 gene sequences had more than a 98.52% match with F. solani sequences in Fusarium-ID databases. To test for pathogenicity, the inoculum was grown for 10 days at 25°C on 200 g of sterilized boiled wheat grain and sand (3:1, v/v) with a 20-ml spore suspension (107 conidia/ml) of strain XYWLD-07. Two-year-old tea seedlings were planted in pots of autoclaved soil with 5% (m/m) strain XYWLD-07 inoculum, but controls were grown in autoclaved soil with only a sterile wheat/sand mix. The experiment was performed five times. After 30 days, collar canker symptoms appeared on inoculated tea branches, and the control was asymptomatic. The fungal pathogen was reisolated from the symptomatic tea tissues and again identified as F. solani based on the above analysis of the five gene sequences. F. solani has been previously identified as the causal agent of collar canker and dieback of C. sinensis in Sri Lanka (Sinniah et al. 2017) and India (Sarmah et al. 2017). To our knowledge, this is the first report of F. solani causing collar canker and dieback of C. sinensis in China. As this disease could result in death of tea bushes, effective management strategies should be investigated and applied.The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.References:Gardes, M., and Bruns, T. D. 1993. Mol. Ecol. 2:113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.xCrossref, ISI, Google ScholarO'Donnell, K., et al. 2010. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3708. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00989-10Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSarmah, S. R., et al. 2017. J. Tea Sci. Res. 10:5376.Google ScholarSinniah, G. D., et al. 2017. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 12:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-017-0262-5Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarW. Xu and F. Zhao contributed equally to this work.Funding: Funding was provided by the Science-Technology Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientists of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2022YQ06).The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 106, No. 8 August 2022SubscribeISSN:0191-2917e-ISSN:1943-7692 Download Cover Image Metrics Article History Issue Date: 29 Jul 2022Published: 29 Jun 2022First Look: 24 Jan 2022Accepted: 19 Jan 2022 Page: 2263 Information© 2022 The American Phytopathological SocietyFundingHenan Academy of Agricultural SciencesGrant/Award Number: 2022YQ06KeywordsCamellia sinensiscollar canker and diebackFusarium solaniThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.PDF downloadCited byGenomic and Phenotypic Insights into the Potential of Bacillus subtilis YB-15 Isolated from Rhizosphere to Biocontrol against Crown Rot and Promote Growth of Wheat20 May 2022 | Biology, Vol. 11, No. 5

First Report of Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Epicoccum Layuense on Camellia Sinensis in Chongqing, China

Colletotrichum Cymbidiicola Causes Leaf Spot of Cymbidium Ensifolium in Jilin Province, China

First Report of Leaf Brown Spot Caused by Epicoccum Sorghinum on Digitaria Sanguinalis in China

First Report of Neopestalotiopsis Chrysea Causing Twig Dieback of Rabbiteye Blueberry (vaccinium Ashei) in China

First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by Clonostachys rosea on Tea (Camellia sinensis) in China

Longitudinal predictors of changes to illicit drug use among young Australian women.

First report of Trichoderma roseum causing tea leaf rot in China

First report of Fusarium proliferatum causing leaf spot on tea plants in Jiangxi Province, China

Epicoccum layuense Causing Leaf Spot on Oxalis corymbosa in China

First Report of Leaf Spot of Weigela florida Caused by Epicoccum layuense in China

First Report of Leaf Spot Blight of Camellia oleifera Caused by Diaporthe mahothocarpus in China

First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by Xanthomonas Campestris on Poinsettia in China

First Report of Fruit Rot on ‘cuiguan’ Pear Caused by Fusarium Proliferatum in China

Electron microscopic studies of the human eye. II. Study of the trabeculae by light and electron microscopy.

First Report of Collar Canker and Dieback of Camellia Sinensis Caused by Fusarium Solani Species Complex in Henan, China.

First Report of Southern Blight on Chrysanthemum Morifolium Caused by Sclerotium Rolfsii in China

Interview data versus questionnaire data in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiological studies.

First report of leaf anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum camelliae on tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in South Korea

First Report of Burkholderia Gladioli Causing Rice Panicle Blight and Grain Discoloration in China

The probability of causation under a stochastic model for individual risk.

First Report of Fusarium Pseudograminearum Causing Root Rot on Soybean (glycine Max) in Henan, China