Abstract:Despite its popularity, soft power remains power of confusion. This paper examines the concept, with a special focus on the nature and sources of soft power. Nye's notion of soft power is largely ethnocentric and based on the assumption that there is a link between attractiveness and the ability to influence others in international relations. This poses two problems: First, a country has many different actors. Some of them like the attraction and others do not. Whether the attraction will lead to the ability to influence the policy of the target country depends on which groups in that country find it attractive and how much control they have on policy making. Secondly, policy making at the state level is far more complicated than at the personal level, and has different dynamics that emphasise the rational considerations. This leaves little room for emotional elements, thus significantly reducing the effect of soft power. Given the nature of soft power being uncontrollable and unpredictable, it would be impossible to wield soft power in any organised and coordinated fashion, as Nye suggested. Furthermore, the relationship between two countries is shaped by many complex factors. It is ultimately decided by the geopolitics and strategic interests of nations, in which soft power may play only a limited role. The paper also discusses the link between soft power and nation branding, as both concepts are concerned with a nation's influence on the world stage. Public diplomacy is a subset of nation branding that focuses on the political brand of a nation, whereas nation branding is about how a nation as whole reshapes international opinions. A successful nation branding campaign will help create a more favourable and lasting image among the international audience, thus further enhancing a country's soft power.

The thought of soft power in cross-border M&As

Attaining Corporate Competitiveness Through Soft Power

Study on the Mechanism of Corporate Soft Power

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

How Does Foreign Acquirers’ ESG Misbehaviour Exposure Affect the Completion of Cross‐Border Acquisitions?

Study on the Content,Process and Mechanism of Corporate Soft Power

Studying on the Mechanism that Corporate Social Responsibility How to Enhance Corporate Soft Power:Hoiley Group Case Study

The Development of Soft Power for Chinese Corporations & Their Differences from Other Companies——With a Case Study on India’s Tata Steel and China’s Baosteel

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A double-edged sword for Chinese firms’ innovation performance

Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’

Analyzing the nexus between Chinese industrial policy and cross-border M&As

The Conceptual Gap On Soft Power Between China And Europe And Its Impact On Bilateral Relations

Dragon’s Underbelly: an Analysis of China’s Soft Power

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Sino-US Strategic Competition and Cross-Border M&As by Chinese Enterprises: Evidence from Public Opinion Big Data

Chinese Outbound Tourists and Daigou As Soft Power

Chinese Soft Power

Technology-Driven Cross-Border M&A, CSR, and Enterprise Innovation Performance—Evidence from China

Cross-cultural Management Problems and Countermeasures of Multinational Corporations: Take M Group's Acquisition of X Company as an Example

Soft power: Power of attraction or confusion?

ISSUES OF BUILDING CHINA’S FOREIGN POLICY THROUGH THE PRISM OF “SOFT POWER” AND PUBLIC DIPLOMACY