Abstract:Under the dual-carbon background, coal power enterprises are required to actively fulfill their social responsibility in order to achieve energy saving and emission reduction as soon as possible. Considering the uncertainty of the external environment and the potential conflict of interest of the key stakeholders in the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility, coal power enterprises are not always positive in fulfilling their social responsibility. This paper combines prospect theory and mental account theory with evolutionary game to construct an evolutionary game model involving coal power enterprises, government regulators and the public to study the social responsibility behavior of coal power enterprises. The results of the study show that: (1) The social responsibility behavior of coal power enterprises under the dual-carbon background is a typical cost-driven behavior, and coal power enterprises are more sensitive to costs compared to benefits. (2) The formulation of regulatory policies by government regulators largely depends on the decision inertia of coal power enterprises, and the formulation of regulatory policies by government regulators will also affect the decision inertia of coal power enterprises. (3) The public's strategic choices do not entirely depend on the strategic choices of coal and power enterprises and government regulators, and are more closely related to the setting of the reference point. (4) In addition to the realistic factors, the subjective factors of decision makers are also important factors affecting the fulfillment of social responsibility of coal and power enterprises. Based on the results of the study, this paper proposes countermeasures to enhance the internal driving force of coal power enterprises to fulfill their social responsibility behaviors from the aspects of establishing a communication mechanism, improving the reward and punishment system, and strengthening risk management.

On strategy of power plant investment incompliance with nation's electricity reform

Analysis of Over-Investment in Generation Capacity Based on Game Theory

An Option-game Based Approach for Generation Investment Decision-making

Generation Investment Decision-Making at the Change of Electricity Market and CO2 Emission Policy

A Game Theory Analysis of China's Agri-biomass-based Power Generation Supply Chain: A Co-opetition Strategy

A Real Option Approach to Generation Investment Decision-making in Electricity Market Environment

Optimal investment portfolio strategies for power enterprises under multi-policy scenarios of renewable energy

Generation side strategy and user side cost based on equilibrium analysis of the power market under the reliability option

A Game-Theoretic Study of the Coordinated Expansion Planning for Power Generation and Transmission

An Investment Decision-Making Approach for Power Grid Projects: A Multi-Objective Optimization Model

Option-game-based method for generation investment analysis considering uncertain carbon reduction policy in the electricity market

STRATEGIC BIDDING WITH APPLICATION OF GAME THEORY

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Price Competition Strategy for Power Generation-Side Market

Real Options Approach and Its Applications in Power Systems

Development of bidding strategies in electricity markets using possibility theory

Steady-state analysis of social responsibility strategy of coal power enterprises from the perspective of game theory

Medium and Long-term Power Purchase Plan Based on Bargaining Game

Optimal Investment Strategy for Thermal Generation Companies Based on Portfolio Theory under RPS

Two-Layer Game Theoretic Microgrid Capacity Optimization Considering Uncertainty of Renewable Energy

Investing and Pricing with Supply Uncertainty in Electricity Market: A General View Combining Wholesale and Retail Market

The price-bidding strategy for investors in a renewable auction: An option games–based study