Abstract:Short-range and long-range contacts are important in forming protein structure. The proteins can be grouped into four different structural classes according to the content and topology of alpha-helices and beta-strands, and there are all-alpha, all-beta, alpha/beta and alpha+beta proteins. However, there is much difference in statistical property for those classes of proteins. In this paper, we will discuss protein structure in the view of the relative number of long-range (short-range) contacts for each residue. We find the percentage of residues having a large number of long-range contacts in protein is small in all-alpha class of proteins, and large in all-beta class of proteins. However, the percentage of residues is almost the same in alpha/beta and alpha+beta classes of proteins. We calculate the percentage of residues having the number of long-range contacts greater than or equal to (>/=) N(L)=5, and 7 for 428 proteins. The average percentage is 13.3%, 54.8%, 41.4% and 37.0% for all-alpha, all-beta, alpha/beta and alpha+beta classes of proteins with N(L)=5, respectively. With N(L) increasing, the percentage decreases, especially for all-alpha class of proteins. In the meantime, the percentage of residues having the number of short-range contacts greater than or equal to N(S) (>/=N(S)) in protein samples is large for all-alpha class of proteins, and small for all-beta class of proteins, especially for large N(S). We also investigate the ability of amino residues in forming a large number of long-range and short-range contacts. Cys, Val, Ile, Tyr, Trp and Phe can form a large number of long-range contacts easily, and Glu, Lys, Asp, Gln, Arg and Asn can form a large number of long-range contacts, but with difficulty. We also discuss the relative ability in forming short-range contacts for 20 amino residues. Comparison with Fauchere-Pliska hydrophobicity scale and the percentage of residues having large number of long-range contacts is also made. This investigation can provide some insights into the protein structure.

Assessing distance measures for protein structure comparison

Comparing 3-D Protein Structures Similarity by Using Fractal Features

3D Protein Structures Similarity Matching Based on Fractal Features

A Method for Measuring Protein Structure Similarity Based on the Molecular Inner Spatial Density Distribution

Approaches for 3D Protein Structure Similarity Comparison-a Survey

A Similarity Computing Algorithm for Proteins

Comparing protein structures and inferring functions with a novel three-dimensional Yau-Hausdorff method.

A Multiple Criteria Framework for 3D Protein Structure Similarity Retrieval

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

Spherical Distance Metrics Applied to Protein Structure Classification

Distances and classification of amino acids for different protein secondary structures

A New Approach for Examining the Similarity of Protein 3D Shape

A new method on reconstructing protein structure from NOESY distances

BDM: An Assessment Metric for Protein Complex Structure Models Based on Distance Difference Matrix

A hyperparameter consensus method for agreement under uncertainty

Utilizing the Scale-Invariant Feature Transform Algorithm to Align Distance Matrices Facilitates Systematic Protein Structure Comparison

Angle-distance image matching techniques for protein structure comparison.

Automatic retrieval of 3D protein structures based on shape similarity

A Review of Protein Inter-residue Distance Prediction

Dept. for Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report Data-driven Formant Synthesis Data-driven Formant Synthesis

Protein Structure Determination Using a Riemannian Approach