Roboethics in Education and Society

Michael A. Peters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1602890
2020-01-01
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Abstract:1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. 4. A robot may not injure humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm [added later]. – Isaac Asimov (1942) ‘Run-around’, I, Robot (The Isaac Asimov Collection ed.). New York City: Doubleday. At the First International Symposium on Roboethics in 2004 held in conjunction by the Scuola di Robotica, the Arts Lab of Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, and the Theological Institute of Pontificia Accademia della Santa Croce, Rome scientists were encouraged ‘to dialogue among themselves, and with scholars coming from disciplines apparently far from Robotics – such as Philosophy, Sociology, Anthropology, Science Fiction, Literature – about the near future effects of the presence robots in our societies.’ The symposium posed these issues and questions:
What problem does this paper attempt to address?