Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Prophylactic Therapy on Hemophilia A in China

胡善联,何江江,杨燕,康琦
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7664/CHE20170914
IF: 5.156
2017-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:Objective:To compare the main therapeutic factors of hemophilia A treatment,evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment programs,and then provide a reference for the decision of the treatment program.Methods:According to expert conference,multidimensional decision analysis method(MDCA) approach was applied to score these 10 characteristics of treatment effects on hemophilia and the treatment scheme,including standard dose of prevention and treatment,the low dose of preventive treatment and on-demand treatment.Meanwhile,the weights of different characteristic indexes were gained.Results:It was generally believed that the standard preventive treatment program was the best.Analysis found that the standard dose of prevention and treatment costs was high(345 000 yuan),while the treatment effect was much better than the low dose of preventive treatment and on-demand treatment program.Conclusion:For long-term cost-effective analysis,standardized prophylaxis treatment could reduce the occurrence of complication and the lifetime health care cost.However,the current medical insurance reimbursement policy of FVIII treatment on-demand were different and the reimbursement level were inequal in China,which needed to be further improved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?