Abstract:The present paper aims to contribute to the ongoing scholarly discussion about the impact of Western concepts on the modern East Asian understanding of Buddhism. Previous studies on the intellectual and cultural history of Chinese Buddhism in China’s Republican (1911–1949) period suggest that the newly imported distinctions between religion and philosophy, and reason and faith, were instrumental in creating a new secular discourse that favoured the doctrinally orientated Buddhist traditions (notably Consciousness-only/Yogācāra) and belittled the more practical and devotional Buddhist currents (especially Pure Land Buddhism). While those observations pertain to the views of secular elites, a much more complex picture emerges from the confessional literature of the Republican period, for example Buddhist journals. As the present paper demonstrates, while some followers of the movement of ‘Consciousness-only studies’ were indeed critical of Pure Land devotionalism, they did not necessarily problematise it by appealing to the newly introduced Western conceptual framework.The first part of the present paper reexamines the devotional model of Pure Land practice associated with the influential Republican-era monk Yinguang. It argues that Yinguang’s lukewarm attitude towards intellectual approach to Buddhism was itself based in his particular interpretation of traditional Buddhist thought – especially the scholastic distinction between ‘principle’ and ‘phenomena’, and the Sinitic Buddha-Nature thought, which prioritises practical and non-conceptual wisdom over discursive knowledge. In the second part the paper turns to the critique of popular Pure Land piety undertaken by the lay Consciousness-only scholar Tang Dayuan, who opted for including doctrinal study in the practice of Pure Land Buddhism. Whereas Tang’s arguments for this case refer to the increasingly globalised and Westernised intellectual scene of Republican China, his reformist postulates mainly target the aforementioned exegetical and doctrinal assumptions that were shared by Yinguang and other Pure Land preachers. For example, Tang appears to sideline the dichotomy of principle (insight) and phenomena (practice) and opts instead for a unified standard of Pure Land practice grounded in doctrinal understanding. At the same time, he adduces Consciousness-only scholasticism to argue for a broader and more nuanced understanding of Buddhist wisdom, which includes discursive and communicable knowledge. In these respects Tang’s critique reveals a continuity between late imperial and modern Buddhist thought, both in terms of underlying concerns and the concepts that were used to articulate them.

The Question Consciousness of Tang Yongtong's Study of Buddhism

Thinking on Methodology in Culture History of Literature in Tang Dynasty

An intensive study of Tang Yongtong’s thoughts on culture in the 1920s:Tang Yongtong and Xue Heng school

On the Intellectual Origins of Tang Dynasty Taoism Philosophy

Buddhist Impact on Chinese Culture

Confucian,Buddhist,and Taoist Thinkers and Chinese Culture and Ideology

The Religious Question in Modern China

Study on the Complementation and Harmony of Zhongnan Culture with Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism

Eminent Monk Yongming Yanshou and Buddhism in the Kingdom of Wuyue

China's Resources for Constructing the Contemporary Philosophy of Culture

Philosophical Reflections on "Sudden Enlightenment" and "Meditation"

Practice and Understanding in Modern Chinese Pure Land Buddhism

Contemporary Taoism Ideology and Life Care

On the Influence of Confucianism and Taoism on Buddhist Inwardness Ideology from the Angle of Hermeneutics

Traditional Chinese Culture Transition into the Philosophy of the “New Era”

Cultural Communication and Identity: A study on the Relationship between Yunnan Han Buddhism and the Strengthening the sense of Community for the Chinese Nation

The Cause of Buddha-like Mindset in the Chinese Young Generation and the Potential Impact

History of the Study of Chinese Traditional Architecture in the 20th Century : Specificity of Tang Dynasty Cult Objects

A Brief Comment on Chinese Buddhism and the Spirit of Humanism

The Way of Thinking and the Spiritual World of the Chinese——elationship-based, Collectivism and the Foremost Kinship

THE MODERN VIJNAPTIMATRATA STUDY IN THE CULTURAL DIALOGES CONTEXT