Abstract:Background: The choice of carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS), as surgical and interventional treatment of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis, respectively, has been controversial in decades, especially for asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis. Age and the diameter of impaired carotid artery might be 2 important factors to decide whether CEA or CAS should be performed. Besides, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been confirmed as an effective method to predict the risk of stroke by classifying the carotid plaque into 4 grades. The role of CEUS in the choice of CEA or CAS still remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 38 patients who underwent CEA with primary closure and 36 patients who underwent CAS in our hospital from October 2008 to January 2013 is conducted. Preoperative CEUS was performed to all patients, and data were collected and analyzed. All CEAs were performed with transverse incision. Results: The hospital stay was longer for the endarterectomy group than the stenting group (15.39 versus 10.91 d, P < 0.001), with an approximately two-third reduction of hospital costs ((sic)23686.21 versus (sic)60855.34, P < 0.001). The overall incidence of perioperative complications in the endarterectomy group was 7.9%, with no statistically significant difference in the group with internal carotid artery greater than or equal to 5 mm and in the group with internal carotid artery less than 5 mm (9.1% versus 6.3%, P = 0.75). No restenosis occurred in either of the subgroups during the follow-up. In patients older than 70 years, the perioperative complications were 0% in CEA and 10.53% in CAS (P = 0.42); the long-term restenosis was 0% in CEA and 5.26% in CAS (P = 0.67). In patients younger than 70 years, the perioperative complications were 11.5% in CEA and 23.53% in CAS (P = 0.31); the long-term restenosis was 0% in CEA and 0% in CAS (P > 0.01). For patients with grade 4 plaque in CEUS, the incidence of adverse events in the CAS group was significantly higher than that in the CEA group (7.14% versus 55.56%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in perioperative complications or restenosis rate between the CAS group and the CEA group in this study. Neither the diameter of impaired carotid artery or age could be considered as an indication of applying CEA or CAS. However, CEUS might be used as a perioperative assessment method to decide whether CEA or CAS should be performed to different patients. The higher the grade of plaque enhancement, the higher the risk of adverse events and restenosis for CAS might occur.

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[A Single Center Large Cohort Study on Perioperative Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy of 547 Cases].

Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis

Comparison of Perioperative Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting and Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Outcome Differences Between Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) and Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) in Postoperative Ventricular Arrhythmia, Neurological Complications, and In-Hospital Mortality

[Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Stenting: a Prospective Randomized Trial].

Systematic and Comprehensive Comparison of Incidence of Restenosis Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis

Comparison of carotid artery endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis.

Efifcacy Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Comparison the effects of carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting for contralateral carotid occlusion

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis: A national cohort study

Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting for High-risk Carotid Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting on High-Risk Carotid Stenosis Patients

Clinical outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting for internal carotid artery stenosis

Role of Carotid Artery Stenting in Prevention of Stroke for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Bayesian Cross-Design and Network Meta-Analyses

[Clinical Selection of Endovascular Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis].

Comparison of Long Term Prognosis between Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting; A Korean Population-Based Study Using National Insurance Data

Perioperative and follow-up results of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with carotid near-occlusion.