Temperament-Character Traits and Attitudes Toward Premature Ejaculation in 4 Types of Premature Ejaculation.

Pan Gao,Jingjing Gao,Yunwu Wang,Dangwei Peng,Yao Zhang,Hu Li,Tianle Zhu,Wei Zhang,Yutian Dai,Hui Jiang,Xiansheng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.001

2021-01-01

Abstract:Background: Although temperament-character traits and attitudes toward premature ejaculation (PE) are known to be associated with PE, it is of great significance to study them in PE. Moreover, few studies have evaluated these traits and attitudes in the new classification of 4 subtypes of PE. Aim: We investigated the temperament-character traits and attitudes toward PE in 4 types of PE and their associations with PE. Methods: Between December 2018 and December 2019, we conducted a survey in our hospital, and enrolled 350 men who complained of PE and 252 men without any complaint of PE. Temperament-character traits and attitudes toward PE were independently assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised and several targeted questions, respectively. The Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) was used to evaluate ejaculation control, sexual life satisfaction, and distress caused by PE. Outcomes: The outcomes included differences of temperament-character traits and attitudes toward PE among 2 groups and their associations with PE. Results: Of the 2 groups, men with PE complaints had lower novelty seeking/self-transcendence (NS/ST) scores and higher harm avoidance (HA) scores vs men without any complaints of PE. Among the 4 types of PE, men with variable PE had the highest score of HA and lowest score of NS; the lowest score of ST was recorded in men with lifelong PE. Additionally, the total and subdomain scores of IPE in men with subjective PE were higher than the other subtypes of PE. After adjusting for age, positive correlations were observed in HA score and total and subdomain scores of IPE, whereas the inverse was true corresponding to NS and ST. Clinical Implications: The current study has provided a new perspective for understanding the impact of psychological factors on PE. Strengths & Limitations: This is the first study to systematically assess the effects of personality traits and attitudes on PE, especially among the 4 types of PE. The main drawback is that the generalizability of this study may be limited by the fact that it was conducted in a single cultural/societal background. Conclusion: Men who complained of PE tended to react with indifference or rejection to novelty, tended to feel unsatisfied, cannot effectively adapt to changes in the surrounding environment, and tended to avoid situations involving risk. These characteristics could lead to their becoming disheartened when faced with PE. Furthermore, the attitude of men with PE reflects the needs of the patient during treatment from one aspect.