Abstract:Objective This study focused on the assessment of paravertebral ossification (PO) after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) using computed tomography (CT) images. Methods In this retrospective study, 52 patients (from 2004 to 2010) who received CDA at a single center were included (32 males). Preoperative and follow-up X-ray and CT images of all patients who underwent single-level CDA were collected. PO from the C2/3 to C7/T1 in each patient was graded based on a CT grading system. Each segment was divided into operative level, adjacent level, or non-adjacent level. The McAfee' classification system was used to grade PO using X-ray plain film. The range of motion (ROM) and scores of neurological symptoms (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) at both preoperative and final follow-up time were acquired. Progression and classification of PO in each group was compared using the chi-square test. ROM between groups were compared using independentt-test. JOA score and NDI between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Results The average follow-up time was 81.2 months. In comparison with the preoperative status, the progression of PO development in left and right areas (the Luschka joints areas) in the operative level groups was significantly more severe (area L,chi(2)value = 36.612,P < 0.001; area R, chi(2)value = 39.172,P < 0.001) than the non-adjacent level groups. In contrast, although the prevalence of PO in all areas of the adjacent level groups was higher than that of the non-adjacent level group in the same segments, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the progression of PO development. The follow-up high-grade (grades III and IV) PO incidence rate using X-ray grading system (3.85%) was significantly lower than that using CT grading system in area L (42.31%) and R (38.46%), but close to that in area A (5.77%) and P (1.92%). The final follow-up ROM was not significantly different with preoperative ROM in patients with low-grade PO (9.47 degrees +/- 4.12 degrees vs.9.76 degrees +/- 3.69 degrees,P= 0.794). However, in patients with high-grade PO, the final follow-up ROM was significantly lower than preoperative ROM (5.77 degrees +/- 3.32 degrees vs.9.28 degrees +/- 4.15 degrees,P < 0.001). There was no significant difference for JOA score and NDI at follow-up between patients with high-grade and low-grade PO (JOA, 16.2 +/- 1.1vs.16.8 +/- 0.9,P= 0.489; NDI, 8.9 +/- 6.1vs.8.0 +/- 7.3,P= 0.317). Conclusion High-grade PO was observed in the areas of the Luschka joints at the operative level after CDA, which was difficult to observe using X-ray plain film. The PO formation at adjacent segments was not significant.

The Correlation Between the Severity of Uncovertebral Joints Degeneration and Heterotopic Ossification after Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement

Quantitative analysis of the degeneration of cervical spine and the correlation to the heterotopic ossification after artificial cervical disc replacement

The correlation between patient selection and heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement

The Effect of Preoperative Cervical Spondylosis on Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement

[Analysis of Effectiveness and Incidence of Heterotopic Ossification after Single-Level Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement].

Quantitative Analysis of the Correlation Between Preoperative Cervical Degeneration and Postoperative Heterotopic Ossification after Cervical Disc Replacement: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Data.

Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification after cervical Baguera C disc arthroplasty

Is There a Relationship Between Bony Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Hybrid Surgery?

Incidence of Heterotopic Ossification at 10 years after Cervical Disc Replacement

Association between anterior bone loss and anterior heterotopic ossification in hybrid surgery

Risk factors associated with heterotopic ossification following Bryan disc replacement:a retrospective study

Generation and Development of Paravertebral Ossification in Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement A Detailed Analytic Report Using Coronal Reconstruction CT

Enhance the Study on Surgical Indication for Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement and Reduce the Occurrence of Heterotopic Ossification

Impact of cervical disc herniation combined with mild ossification on range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement

Generation and Development of Paravertebral Ossification in Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement

Effect of Bryan disk replacement on adjacent level:Three-year follow up

The Assessment Of Paravertebral Ossification Progression After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Based Onctimages: A Long-Term Follow-Up

Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three‐Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

The incidence of heterotopic ossification in cervical artificial disc replacement in Chinese mainland population: A meta-analysis

Heterotopic ossification after artificial disc replacement: problems and prospects

Initial exploration of clinical outcomes of consecutive two-level cervical artificial disc replacement