Study of B, Kwt e- decays in the PQCD factorization approach with lattice QCD input

Su-Ping Jin,Xue-Qing Hu,Zhen-Jun Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.013001
IF: 5.407
2020-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:In this paper, we studied systematically the semileptonic decays B (- with r =) by using the perturbative QCD (PQCD) and the "PQCD + Lattice" factorization approach, respectively. We first evaluated all relevant form factors F (q2) in the low -q2 region using the PQCD approach, and we also took the available lattice QCD results at the end point q2, as additional inputs to improve the extrapolation of the form factors to the high -q2 region. We calculated the branching ratios and twelve other kinds of physical observables. From our studies, we find the following points: (a) for B, -Y KI"1""1- decays, the PQCD and PQCD + Lattice predictions for branching ratios BA -y Kl+ /1, the ratios of the branching ratios and kkf, and the longitudinal polarization asymmetry of the leptons PL agree well within errors; (b) the PQCD and PQCD + Lattice predictions for the CP-averaged branching ratio 13(13s K*1t it-) are (3.17179-85) x 10-8 and (2.48-+0 o6) x 10-8 respectively, which agree well with the LHCb measured value (2.9 1.1) x 10-8 and the light -cone sum rule prediction; (c) for the ratios.RZ!, and Kr, the PQCD and PQCD + Lattice predictions agree well with each other and have a small error less than 10%; (d) for the direct CP asymmetries Acp of all considered decay modes, they are always very small as expected: less than 5% in magnitude; (e) for the angular observables P1,2[3 and P,I1568, our theoretical predictions for each kind of lepton are consistent within errors; (0 the theoretical predictions of the angular observables P3 and /3'6 are less than 10-2 in size, but the magnitude of P12 and P115 are larger than 0.2; and (g) the PQCD and PQCD + Lattice predictions of the binned values of all considered observables in the two q2 bins [0.1-0.98] GeV2 and [1.1-6] GeV2 generally agree with each other and are also consistent with the light-cone sum rule results within errors. We believe that above predictions could be tested by future LHCb and Belle -II experiments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?