Abstract:Objective To label neural stem cells with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and track labeled cells with MRI in vitro and in vivo after implantation. Methods 13 SD rats were used for the study. Rat neural stem cells were labeled with SPIO combined with PLL by the mean of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Prussian blue staining and electron microscopy were conducted to identify the iron particles in these neural stem cells, and SPIO-labeled cells were tracked with 1.5 T and 4.7T MRI in vivo and in vitro after implantation. The subjects were divided into five groups, including 5×105 labeled cells, 5×105 unlabeled cells, cell culture medium with SPIO, cell culture medium without SPIO and distilled water. MRI scanning sequences included T_1WI, T_2WI and T_2*WI. R_2 and R_2* relaxation rate of labeled cells were calculated. Results (1) Neural stem cells could be labeled with SPIO and labeling efficiency was 100%, Prussian blue staining showed numerous blue-stained iron particles in the cytoplasm. (2) The average percentage change of signal intensity of labeled cells on T_1WI in 1.5 T and 4.7 T MRI was 20.53% and 24.06% respectively,on T_2WI was 40.78% and 50.66% respectively,and on T_2*WI was 46.57% and 53.70% respectively. The signal intensity had no significant difference between T_2WI and T_2*WI in 1.5 T MRI, however the signal intensity had significant difference between T_2WI or T_2*WI and T_1WI. (3) T_2 of unlabeled cells and labeled cells in 4.7 T MRI were 516 ms and 77 ms respectively, R_2 were 1.94 s -1 and 12.98 s -1 respectively; and T_2* were 109 ms and 22.9 ms, R_2* were 9.17 s -1 and 43.67 s -1 respectively. (4) Remarkable low signal area on T_2WI and T_2*WI was seen in the left brain implanted with labeled cells one week ago, however no signal change in the right brain implanted with unlabeled cells. Conclusion Neural stem cells can be labeled effectively with SPIO; R_2 and R_2* of labeled cells were increased obviously; MRI can be used to track labeled cells in vitro and in vivo.

Stem Cell Labeling and Tracking with Nanoparticles

Multifaceted Application of Nanoparticle-Based Labeling Strategies for Stem Cell Therapy

Stem Cells Controlling, Imaging and Labeling by Functional Nanomaterials

Stem Cell Tracking with Optically Active Nanoparticles.

Labeling Neural Stem Cells with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide and MRI Tracking in Vitro and in Vivo

Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Noninvasive Stem Cell Tracking in Regenerative Medicine

Stem Cell Labeling With Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Using Focused Ultrasound And Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tracking

Tracking Neural Stem Cells in vivo: Achievements and Limitations

Nanomaterial-involved Neural Stem Cell Research: Disease Treatment, Cell Labeling, and Growth Regulation

Applications of Nanotechnology in Stem Cell Research

New Opportunities: The Use of Nanotechnologies to Manipulate and Track Stem Cells

Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles As MRI Contrast Agents for Non-invasive Stem Cell Labeling and Tracking

Nanoparticle-based Cell Trackers for Biomedical Applications

Nano Contrast Agents for Stem Cell Tracking in Stroke

Protamine functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for stem cell labeling and in vivo Raman/magnetic resonance/photoacoustic triple-modal imaging

Long-term Fate Tracking and Quantitative Analyzing of Nanoparticles in Stem Cells with Bright-Field Microscopy

Luminescent Nanomaterials for Biological Labelling

Nanoparticles for Stem Cell Tracking and the Potential Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Reporter gene based cell trafficking

Stem cell tracking using effective self-assembled peptide-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles.

Nanotechnology shaping stem cell therapy: Recent advances, application, challenges, and future outlook