Abstract:Unlike alpha-amino acids, peptides formed from beta-amino acids (beta-peptides) display stability toward enzymatic degradation and may form turns and helices with as few as four residues. Because both the C alpha and C beta of the beta-amino acid may bear substituents, a large number of beta-amino acids can be synthesized. Beta-peptides form various well-defined secondary structures, including 14-helix, 12-helix, 10/12-helix, 10-helix, 8-helix, turn structures, sheets, and hairpins. For all of these reasons, beta-amino acids have been increasingly used as building blocks for molecular design and pharmaceutical applications. To explain the conformational features of beta-peptides, several quantum mechanics and molecular dynamics studies that rationalize the observed conformational features have been reported. However, a systematic account that unifies various factors critical to the conformational features is still lacking. In this Account, we present a detailed analysis of the conformational features of various beta-peptides. We start by studying the basic local conformational features of beta-peptides using di- and tripeptide models. Then, various secondary structures of unsubstituted beta-peptides with differing numbers of residues are investigated using a repeating unit approach to derive the intrinsic backbone conformational features. We find that the 10/12-helix is intrinsically most stable for the beta-peptide backbone. The 14-helix, 12-helix, and 10-helix structures have similar stabilities for beta-peptide backbones of four to six residues. The substituent effects on the stabilities of beta-peptide secondary structures are then analyzed. Combined with the substituent effect and the intrinsic backbone preferences, all experimental observations of secondary structure formation can be understood. For example, the 10/12-helix is favored for like-beta(2)/beta(3)-peptides, unlike-beta(3)/beta(3)-peptides, and beta(3)/beta-hGly-peptides because these substitution patterns do not cause steric problems for the 10/12-helix. Beta(3)-peptides, beta(2)-peptides, and beta (2,3)-peptides favor the 14-helix because the substituents in these peptides benefit the 14-helix the most but significantly destabilize the 10/12-helix. Because the 10/12-helix is intrinsically favored and has two favorable positions in each residue for substituents, many more hybrid beta-peptides are predicted to exist in this secondary structure, which suggests the need for further experiments. These results are valuable for determining the best use of these building blocks in the design of well-structured molecules with desirable chemical functions.

De novo design and CD studies of model beta-sheet peptides

De novo design and CD studies of model β-sheet peptides

De Novo Design and Conformational Studies of A Beta-Hairpin Forming Peptide

Peptide De Novo Design: CD Evidences of Β-Hairpin Formation by Eight-residue Peptide

Designing Β-Hairpin Forming Short Peptide

De novo design of discrete, stable 310-helix peptide assemblies

CD evidence of a peptide ongoing alpha/beta/random transition in different solutions

Theoretical Analysis of Secondary Structures of Β-Peptides

De Novo Design And Synthesis Of Four-Helix Bundle Peptides

Design and NMR conformational study of a beta-sheet peptide based on Betanova and WW domains

Theoretical Study on Side-Chain Control of the 14-Helix and the 10/12-Helix of Β-Peptides

CD evidence of a peptide ongoing α/β/random transition in different solutions

Theoretical Study of Β2,3‐peptide Models

De novo design of modular peptide-binding proteins by superhelical matching

Solution Conformation Study on A Beta-Turn Forming Peptide

Theoretical Studies of Β-Peptide Models

Use of Steric Interactions To Control Peptide Turn Geometry. Synthesis of Type VI beta-Turn Mimics with 5-tert-Butylproline

De novo design of parallel and antiparallel A3B3 heterohexameric alpha-helical barrels

The Imide-Dipeptides That Show Strong and Stable Β-Sheet-like Interactions Compared with Natural Sequence

De novo design of peptides that coassemble into β sheet–based nanofibrils