The Difficult Calls in RNA Editing

Brenda Bass,Heather Hundley,Jin Billy Li,Zhiyu Peng,Joe Pickrell,Xinshu Grace Xiao,Li Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2452

IF: 46.9

2012-01-01

Nature Biotechnology

Abstract:Accounting for errors arising from different high-throughput sequencing platforms and those arising from the approaches used to call variants are at the center of a controversy in RNA editing.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Computational Analysis of RNA Editing: Seeking Tiny Discrepancies Between Transcriptome and Genome

Pufeng Du,Yanda Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-009-0013-2

2009-01-01

Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China

Abstract:RNA editing is a type of post-transcriptional processing that can alter the genetic information encoded in the genomic DNA by inserting, deleting or substituting single or multiple nucleotides of the transcripts. In recent years, computational biology of RNA editing, including database construction and computational prediction, has become an important topic. This article reviews the main findings in the computational analysis of RNA editing along with a brief introduction to the basic knowledge of RNA editing.
Single-nucleotide Variants in Human RNA: RNA Editing and Beyond

Yan Guo,Hui Yu,David C. Samuels,Wei Yue,Scott Ness,Ying-yong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/ely032

2019-01-01

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Abstract:Through analysis of paired high-throughput DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq data, researchers quickly recognized that RNA-Seq can be used for more than just gene expression quantification. The alternative applications of RNA-Seq data are abundant, and we are particularly interested in its usefulness for detecting single-nucleotide variants, which arise from RNA editing, genomic variants and other RNA modifications. A stunning discovery made from RNA-Seq analyses is the unexpectedly high prevalence of RNA-editing events, many of which cannot be explained by known RNA-editing mechanisms. Over the past 6-7 years, substantial efforts have been made to maximize the potential of RNA-Seq data. In this review we describe the controversial history of mining RNA-editing events from RNA-Seq data and the corresponding development of methodologies to identify, predict, assess the quality of and catalog RNA-editing events as well as genomic variants.
Elucidating the editome: bioinformatics approaches for RNA editing detection

Maria Angela Diroma,Loredana Ciaccia,Graziano Pesole,Ernesto Picardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx129

IF: 9.5

2017-10-11

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract:RNA editing is a widespread co/posttranscriptional mechanism affecting primary RNAs by specific nucleotide modifications, which plays relevant roles in molecular processes including regulation of gene expression and/or the processing of noncoding RNAs. In recent years, the detection of editing sites has been improved through the availability of high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) technologies. Accurate bioinformatics pipelines are essential for the analysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data to ensure the correct identification of edited sites. Several pipelines, using various read mappers and variant callers with a wide range of adjustable parameters, are available for the detection of RNA editing events. In this review, we discuss some of the most recent and popular tools and provide guidelines for RNA-Seq data generation and analysis for the detection of RNA editing in massive transcriptome data. Using simulated and real data sets, we provide an overview of their behavior, emphasizing the fact that the RNA editing detection in NGS data sets remains a challenging task.

biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology
The Impact of Sequencing Depth on RNA Editing Identification

Zhao Cheng-Hui,Hong Hao,Li Wan-Ying,Li Rui-Jiang,Jiang Shuai,Li Hao,Chen He-Bing,Bo Xiao-Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16476/j.pibb.2019.0036

2019-01-01

PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS

Abstract:RNA editing is an important post-transcriptional modification process. There are many algorithms used to identify RNA editing. This study of the sequencing depth's effect on RNA editing will provide a suggested method for RNA editing research. Mouse reference genome was mapped to the RNA-seq by STAR. Then identified SNV by GATK, finally RNA Editing sites were filtered by Separate method, GIREMI and RNAEditor. The results showed the identification of RNA editing varied in three methods. There was little overlap in results. As the sequencing depth increases, the identified number of RNA editing sites also increases. In conclusion, the identification of RNA editing sites is positive correlated with the sequencing depth.
Sequence based identification of RNA editing sites

Eli Eisenberg,Jin Billy Li,Erez Y Levanon,Erez Y. Levanon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.7.2.11565

2010-03-01

RNA Biology

Abstract:RNA editing diversifies the human transcriptome beyond the genomic repertoire. Recent years have proven a strategy based on genomics and computational sequence analysis as a powerful tool for identification and characterization of RNA editing. In particular, analysis of the human transcriptome has resulted in the identification of thousands of A-to-I editing sites within genomic repeats, as well as a few hundred sites located outside repeats. We review these recent advancements, emphasizing the principles underlying the various methods used. Possible directions for extending these methods are discussed.

biochemistry & molecular biology
A-to-I Editing Sites Are a Genomically Encoded G: Implications for the Evolutionary Significance and Identification of Novel Editing Sites

Nan Tian,Xiaojie Wu,Yaozhou Zhang,Yongfeng Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.797108

2007-01-01

RNA

Abstract:Ribonucleic acid (RNA) editing can extend transcriptomic and proteomic diversity by changing the identity of a particular codon. Genetic recoding as a result of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing can alter highly conserved or invariant coding positions in proteins. Interestingly, examples exist in which A-to-I editing sites in one species are fixed genomically as a G in a closely related species. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that G-to-A mutations at the DNA level may be corrected by post-transcriptional A-to-I RNA editing, while in turn, the edited I (G) may be hardwired into the genome, resulting in an A-to-G mutation. We propose a model in which nuclear A-to-I RNA editing acts as an evolutionary intermediate of genetic variation. We not only provide information on the mechanism behind the evolutionary acquisition of an A-to-I RNA editing site but also demonstrate how to predict nuclear A-to-I editing sites by identifying positions where an RNA editing event would maintain the conservation of a protein relative to its homologs in other species. We identified a novel edited site in the fourth exon of the cacophony transcript coding calcium channel alpha1 and verified it experimentally.
Identification of Bona Fide RNA Editing Sites: History, Challenges, and Opportunities

Meng How Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00462

2023-11-07

Abstract:Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, catalyzed by the adenosine deaminase acting on the RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes of which there are three members (ADAR1, ADAR2, and ADAR3), is a major gene regulatory mechanism that diversifies the transcriptome. It is widespread in many metazoans, including humans. As inosine is interpreted by cellular machineries mainly as guanosine, A-to-I editing effectively gives A-to-G nucleotide changes. Depending on its location, an editing event can generate new protein isoforms or influence other RNA processing pathways. Researchers have found that ADAR-mediated editing performs diverse functions. For example, it enables living organisms such as cephalopods to adapt rapidly to fluctuating environmental conditions such as water temperature. In development, the loss of ADAR1 is embryonically lethal partly because endogenous double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) are no longer marked by inosines, which signal "self", and thus cause the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) sensor to trigger a deleterious interferon response. Hence, ADAR1 plays a key role in preventing aberrant activation of the innate immune system. Furthermore, ADAR enzymes have been implicated in myriad human diseases. Intriguingly, some cancer cells are known to exploit ADAR1 activity to dodge immune responses. However, the exact identities of immunogenic RNAs in different biological contexts have remained elusive. Consequently, there is tremendous interest in identifying inosine-containing RNAs in the cell.The identification of A-to-I RNA editing sites is dependent on the sequencing of nucleic acids. Technological and algorithmic advancements over the past decades have revolutionized the way editing events are detected. At the beginning, the discovery of editing sites relies on Sanger sequencing, a first-generation technology. Both RNA, which is reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA), and genomic DNA (gDNA) from the same source are analyzed. After sequence alignment, one would require an adenosine to be present in the genome but a guanosine to be detected in the RNA sample for a position to be declared as an editing site. However, an issue with Sanger sequencing is its low throughput. Subsequently, Illumina sequencing, a second-generation technology, was invented. By permitting the simultaneous interrogation of millions of molecules, it enables many editing sites to be identified rapidly. However, a key challenge is that the Illumina platform produces short sequencing reads that can be difficult to map accurately. To tackle the challenge, we and others developed computational workflows with a series of filters to discard sites that are likely to be false positives. When Illumina sequencing data sets are properly analyzed, A-to-G variants should emerge as the most dominant mismatch type. Moreover, the quantitative nature of the data allows us to build a comprehensive atlas of editing-level measurements across different biological contexts, providing deep insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of RNA editing. However, difficulties remain in identifying true A-to-I editing sites in short protein-coding exons or in organisms and diseases where DNA mutations and genomic polymorphisms are prevalent and mostly unknown. Nanopore sequencing, a third-generation technology, promises to address the difficulties, as it allows native RNAs to be sequenced without conversion to cDNA, preserving base modifications that can be directly detected through machine learning. We recently demonstrated that nanopore sequencing could be used to identify A-to-I editing sites in native RNA directly. Although further work is needed to enhance the detection accuracy in single molecules from fewer cells, the nanopore technology holds the potential to revolutionize epitranscriptomic studies.
MultiEditR: An easy validation method for detecting and quantifying RNA editing from Sanger sequencing

Mitchell Kluesner,Annette Arnold,Taga Lerner,Rafail Nikolaos Tasakis,Sandra Wüst,Marco Binder,Branden S. Moriarity,Riccardo Pecori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/633685

2019-05-09

Abstract:ABSTRACT RNA editing is the base change that results from RNA deamination by two predominant classes of deaminases; the APOBEC family and the ADAR family. Respectively, deamination of nucleobases by these enzymes are responsible for endogenous editing of cytosine to uracil (C-to-U) and adenosine to inosine (A-to-I). RNA editing is known to play an essential role both in maintaining normal cellular function, as well as altered cellular physiology during oncogenesis and tumour progression. Analysis of RNA editing in these important processes, largely relies on RNA-seq technology for the detection and quantification of RNA editing sites. Despite the power of these technologies, multiple sources of error in detecting and measuring base editing still exist, therefore additional validation and quantification of editing through Sanger sequencing is still required for confirmation of editing. Depending on the number of RNA editing sites that are of interest, this validation step can be both expensive and time-consuming. To address this need we developed the tool MultiEditR which provides a simple, and cost-effective method of detecting and quantifying RNA editing form Sanger sequencing. We expect that MultiEditR will foster further discoveries in this rapidly expanding field.
In Silico and Experimental Approaches for Validating RNA Editing Events in Transcriptomes

Lai Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2024.2432729

2024-01-01

RNA Biology

Abstract:As a typical RNA virus, SARS-CoV-2 is subjected to RNA editing in host cells. While some researchers believe that a traditional variant calling pipeline retrieves all true-positive RNA editing events from the transcriptome, others argue that conventional methods identify many false-positive sites. Here, I describe several additional in silico and experimental approaches to validate the authenticity of RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2. These approaches include requiring strand-specific sequencing, analysis of hyperedited reads, linkage analysis, orthogonal methods like mass spectrometry, and the use of ADAR-deficient host cells. These findings may improve future analyses on the identification of RNA editing, especially in RNA viruses.
Functional Impact of RNA editing and ADARs on regulation of gene expression: perspectives from deep sequencing studies

Hsuan Liu,Chung-Pei Ma,Yi-Tung Chen,Scott C Schuyler,Kai-Ping Chang,Bertrand Chin-Ming Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-4-44

2014-08-19

Abstract:Cells regulate gene expression at multiple levels leading to a balance between robustness and complexity within their proteome. One core molecular step contributing to this important balance during metazoan gene expression is RNA editing, such as the co-transcriptional recoding of RNA transcripts catalyzed by the adenosine deaminse acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Understanding of the adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing process has been broadened considerably by the next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, which allows for in-depth demarcation of an RNA editome at nucleotide resolution. However, critical issues remain unresolved with regard to how RNA editing cooperates with other transcript-associated events to underpin regulated gene expression. Here we review the growing body of evidence, provided by recent NGS-based studies, that links RNA editing to other mechanisms of post-transcriptional RNA processing and gene expression regulation including alternative splicing, transcript stability and localization, and the biogenesis and function of microRNAs (miRNAs). We also discuss the possibility that systematic integration of NGS data may be employed to establish the rules of an “RNA editing code”, which may give us new insights into the functional consequences of RNA editing.

biochemistry & molecular biology
Identifying RNA Editing Sites Using RNA Sequencing Data Alone

Gokul Ramaswami,Rui Zhang,Robert Piskol,Liam P Keegan,Patricia Deng,Mary A O'Connell,Jin Billy Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2330

IF: 48

2013-01-01

Nature Methods

Abstract:We show that RNA editing sites can be called with high confidence using RNA sequencing data from multiple samples across either individuals or species, without the need for matched genomic DNA sequence. We identified many previously unidentified editing sites in both humans and Drosophila; our results nearly double the known number of human protein recoding events. We also found that human genes harboring conserved editing sites within Alu repeats are enriched for neuronal functions.
Full-length PacBio Amplicon Sequencing to Unveil RNA Editing Sites

Xiao-Lu Zhu,Ming-Ling Liao,Ya-Jie Zhu,Yun-Wei Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1574893618666230803112142

2023-01-01

Current Bioinformatics

Abstract:Background: RNA editing enriches post-transcriptional sequence changes. Currently detecting RNA editing sites is mostly based on the Sanger sequencing platform and second-generation sequencing. However, detection with Sanger sequencing is limited by the disturbing background peaks using the direct sequencing method and the clone number using the clone sequencing method, while second-generation sequencing detection is constrained by its short read. Objective: We aimed to design a pipeline that can accurately detect RNA editing sites for full-length long-read amplicons to meet the requirement when focusing on a few specific genes of interest. Method: We developed a novel high-throughput RNA editing sites detection pipeline based on the PacBio circular consensus sequences sequencing which is accurate with high-throughput and long-read coverage. We tested the pipeline on cytosolic malate dehydrogenase in the hard-shelled mussel Mytilus coruscus and further validated it using direct Sanger sequencing. Results: Data generated from the PacBio circular consensus sequences (CCS) amplicons in three mussels were first filtered by quality and then selected by open reading frame. After filtering, 225-2047 sequences of the three mussels, respectively, were used to identify RNA editing sites. With corresponding genomic DNA sequences, we extracted 227-799 candidate RNA editing sites excluding heterozygous sites. We further figured out 7-11 final RESs using a new error model specially designed for RNA editing site detection. The resulting RNA editing sites all agree with the validation using the Sanger sequencing. Conclusion: We report a near-zero error rate method in identifying RNA editing sites of long-read amplicons with the use of PacBio CCS sequencing.
Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes

Ye Xu,Jiyao Liu,Tianyou Zhao,Fan Song,Li Tian,Wanzhi Cai,Hu Li,Yuange Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417126

IF: 5.6

2023-01-01

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract:Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is the most prevalent RNA modification in the nervous systems of metazoans. To study the biological significance of RNA editing, we first have to accurately identify these editing events from the transcriptome. The genome-wide identification of RNA editing sites remains a challenging task. In this review, we will first introduce the occurrence, regulation, and importance of A-to-I RNA editing and then describe the established bioinformatic procedures and difficulties in the accurate identification of these sit esespecially in small sized non-model insects. In brief, (1) to obtain an accurate profile of RNA editing sites, a transcriptome coupled with the DNA resequencing of a matched sample is favorable; (2) the single-cell sequencing technique is ready to be applied to RNA editing studies, but there are a few limitations to overcome; (3) during mapping and variant calling steps, various issues, like mapping and base quality, soft-clipping, and the positions of mismatches on reads, should be carefully considered; (4) Sanger sequencing of both RNA and the matched DNA is the best verification of RNA editing sites, but other auxiliary evidence, like the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous ratio or the linkage information, is also helpful for judging the reliability of editing sites. We have systematically reviewed the understanding of the biological significance of RNA editing and summarized the methodology for identifying such editing events. We also raised several promising aspects and challenges in this field. With insightful perspectives on both scientific and technical issues, our review will benefit the researchers in the broader RNA editing community.
Site-directed RNA editing: recent advances and open challenges

Hamid Mansouri Khosravi,Michael F. Jantsch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2021.1983288

2021-09-27

RNA Biology

Abstract:RNA editing by cytosine and adenosine deaminases changes the identity of the edited bases. While cytosines are converted to uracils, adenines are converted to inosines. If coding regions of mRNAs are affected, the coding potential of the RNA can be changed, depending on the codon affected. The recoding potential of nucleotide deaminases has recently gained attention for their ability to correct genetic mutations by either reverting the mutation itself or by manipulating processing steps such as RNA splicing. In contrast to CRISPR-based DNA-editing approaches, RNA editing events are transient in nature, therefore reducing the risk of long-lasting inadvertent side-effects. Moreover, some RNA-based therapeutics are already FDA approved and their use in targeting multiple cells or organs to restore genetic function has already been shown. In this review, we provide an overview on the current status and technical differences of site-directed RNA-editing approaches. We also discuss advantages and challenges of individual approaches.

biochemistry & molecular biology
Discovering RNA Editing Events in Fungi.

Huiquan Liu,Jin-Rong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0787-9_3

2021-01-01

Abstract:RNA editing is an important posttranscriptional process that alters the genetic information of RNA encoded by genomic DNA. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is the most prevalent type of RNA editing in animal kingdom, catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Recently, genome-wide A-to-I RNA editing is discovered in fungi, involving adenosine deamination mechanisms distinct from animals. Aiming to draw more attention to RNA editing in fungi, here we discuss the considerations for deep sequencing data preparation and the available various methods for detecting RNA editing, with a special emphasis on their usability for fungal RNA editing detection. We describe computational protocols for the identification of candidate RNA editing sites in fungi by using two software packages REDItools and RES-Scanner with RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and genomic DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) data.
Prediction of constitutive A-to-I editing sites from human transcriptomes in the absence of genomic sequences

Shanshan Zhu,Jian-Feng Xiang,Tian Chen,Ling-Ling Chen,Li Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-206

IF: 4.547

2013-01-01

BMC Genomics

Abstract:Background Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is recognized as a cellular mechanism for generating both RNA and protein diversity. Inosine base pairs with cytidine during reverse transcription and therefore appears as guanosine during sequencing of cDNA. Current approaches of RNA editing identification largely depend on the comparison between transcriptomes and genomic DNA (gDNA) sequencing datasets from the same individuals, and it has been challenging to identify editing candidates from transcriptomes in the absence of gDNA information. Results We have developed a new strategy to accurately predict constitutive RNA editing sites from publicly available human RNA-seq datasets in the absence of relevant genomic sequences. Our approach establishes new parameters to increase the ability to map mismatches and to minimize sequencing/mapping errors and unreported genome variations. We identified 695 novel constitutive A-to-I editing sites that appear in clusters (named “editing boxes”) in multiple samples and which exhibit spatial and dynamic regulation across human tissues. Some of these editing boxes are enriched in non-repetitive regions lacking inverted repeat structures and contain an extremely high conversion frequency of As to Is. We validated a number of editing boxes in multiple human cell lines and confirmed that ADAR1 is responsible for the observed promiscuous editing events in non-repetitive regions, further expanding our knowledge of the catalytic substrate of A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR enzymes. Conclusions The approach we present here provides a novel way of identifying A-to-I RNA editing events by analyzing only RNA-seq datasets. This method has allowed us to gain new insights into RNA editing and should also aid in the identification of more constitutive A-to-I editing sites from additional transcriptomes.
RNA Base Editors: the Emerging Approach of RNA Therapeutics.

Jinghui Song,Nan Luo,Liting Dong,Jinying Peng,Chengqi Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1844

2024-01-01

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA

Abstract:RNA-based therapeutics offer a flexible and reversible approach for treating genetic disorders, such as antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, aptamers, mRNA vaccines, and RNA editing. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in RNA base editing to correct disease-relevant point mutations. These achievements have significantly influenced the fields of biotechnology, biomedical research and therapeutics development. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the design and performance of contemporary RNA base editors, including A-to-I, C-to-U, A-to-m(6)A, and U-to-psi. We compare recent innovative developments and highlight their applications in disease-relevant contexts. Lastly, we discuss the limitations and future prospects of utilizing RNA base editing for therapeutic purposes. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Development
Recommendations for detection, validation, and evaluation of RNA editing events in cardiovascular and neurological/neurodegenerative diseases

Korina Karagianni,Alessia Bibi,Alisia Madé,Shubhra Acharya,Mikko Parkkonen,Teodora Barbalata,Prashant K Srivastava,David de Gonzalo-Calvo,Constanza Emanueli,Fabio Martelli,Yvan Devaux,Dimitra Dafou,A Yaël Nossent,EU-CardioRNA COST Action CA17129

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2023.102085

2023-12-05

Abstract:RNA editing, a common and potentially highly functional form of RNA modification, encompasses two different RNA modifications, namely adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) and cytidine to uridine (C-to-U) editing. As inosines are interpreted as guanosines by the cellular machinery, both A-to-I and C-to-U editing change the nucleotide sequence of the RNA. Editing events in coding sequences have the potential to change the amino acid sequence of proteins, whereas editing events in noncoding RNAs can, for example, affect microRNA target binding. With advancing RNA sequencing technology, more RNA editing events are being discovered, studied, and reported. However, RNA editing events are still often overlooked or discarded as sequence read quality defects. With this position paper, we aim to provide guidelines and recommendations for the detection, validation, and follow-up experiments to study RNA editing, taking examples from the fields of cardiovascular and brain disease. We discuss all steps, from sample collection, storage, and preparation, to different strategies for RNA sequencing and editing-sensitive data analysis strategies, to validation and follow-up experiments, as well as potential pitfalls and gaps in the available technologies. This paper may be used as an experimental guideline for RNA editing studies in any disease context.
A novel computational method enables RNA editome profiling during human hematopoiesis from scRNA-seq data

Yan Wu,Shijie Hao,Xiaojing Xu,Guoyi Dong,Wenjie Ouyang,Chao Liu,Hai-Xi Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37325-4

IF: 4.6

2023-06-26

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification with a cell-specific manner and important biological implications. Although single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is an effective method for studying cellular heterogeneity, it is difficult to detect and study RNA editing events from scRNA-seq data because of the low sequencing coverage. To overcome this, we develop a computational method to systematically identify RNA editing sites of cell types from scRNA-seq data. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we apply it to scRNA-seq data of human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) with an annotated lineage differentiation relationship according to previous research and study the impacts of RNA editing on hematopoiesis. The dynamic editing patterns reveal the relevance of RNA editing on different HSPCs. For example, four microRNA (miRNA) target sites on 3ʹ UTR of EIF2AK2 are edited across all HSPC populations, which may abolish the miRNA-mediated inhibition of EIF2AK2 . Elevated EIF2AK2 may thus activate the integrated stress response (ISR) pathway to initiate global translational attenuation as a protective mechanism to maintain cellular homeostasis during HSPCs’ differentiation. Besides, our findings also indicate that RNA editing plays an essential role in the coordination of lineage commitment and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Taken together, we demonstrate the capacity of scRNA-seq data to exploit RNA editing events of cell types, and find that RNA editing may exert multiple modules of regulation in hematopoietic processes.

multidisciplinary sciences
Single-Base Resolution Detection of Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing by Endonuclease-Mediated Sequencing

Juan-Juan Chen,Xue-Jiao You,Lin Li,Neng-Bin Xie,Jiang-Hui Ding,Bi-Feng Yuan,Yu-Qi Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01226

IF: 7.4

2022-06-09

Analytical Chemistry

Abstract:RNA molecules contain diverse modifications that play crucial roles in a wide variety of biological processes. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-Ino) RNA editing is one of the most prevalent modifications among all types of RNA. Abnormal A-to-InoRNA editing has been demonstrated to be associated with many human diseases. Identification of A-to-Ino editing sites is indispensable to deciphering their biological roles. Herein, by employing the unique property of human endonuclease V (hEndoV), we proposed a hEndoV-mediated sequencing (hEndoV-seq) method for the single-base resolution detection of A-to-InoRNA editing sites. In this approach, the terminal 3'OH of RNA is first blocked by 3'-deoxyadenosine (3'-deoxy-A). Specific cleavage of Ino sites by hEndoV protein produces new terminal 3'OH, which can be identified by sequencing analysis, and therefore offers the site-specific detection of Ino in RNA. The principle of hEndoV-seq is straightforward and the analytical procedure is simple. No chemical reaction is involved in the sequencing library preparation. The whole procedure in hEndoV-seq is carried out under mild conditions and RNA is not prone to degradation. Taken together, the proposed hEndoV-seq method is capable of site-specific identification of A-to-Ino editing in RNA, which provides a valuable tool for elucidating the functions of A-to-Ino editing in RNA.

chemistry, analytical

The Difficult Calls in RNA Editing

Computational Analysis of RNA Editing: Seeking Tiny Discrepancies Between Transcriptome and Genome

Single-nucleotide Variants in Human RNA: RNA Editing and Beyond

Elucidating the editome: bioinformatics approaches for RNA editing detection

The Impact of Sequencing Depth on RNA Editing Identification

Sequence based identification of RNA editing sites

A-to-I Editing Sites Are a Genomically Encoded G: Implications for the Evolutionary Significance and Identification of Novel Editing Sites

Identification of Bona Fide RNA Editing Sites: History, Challenges, and Opportunities

MultiEditR: An easy validation method for detecting and quantifying RNA editing from Sanger sequencing

In Silico and Experimental Approaches for Validating RNA Editing Events in Transcriptomes

Functional Impact of RNA editing and ADARs on regulation of gene expression: perspectives from deep sequencing studies

Identifying RNA Editing Sites Using RNA Sequencing Data Alone

Full-length PacBio Amplicon Sequencing to Unveil RNA Editing Sites

Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes

Site-directed RNA editing: recent advances and open challenges

Discovering RNA Editing Events in Fungi.

Prediction of constitutive A-to-I editing sites from human transcriptomes in the absence of genomic sequences

RNA Base Editors: the Emerging Approach of RNA Therapeutics.

Recommendations for detection, validation, and evaluation of RNA editing events in cardiovascular and neurological/neurodegenerative diseases

A novel computational method enables RNA editome profiling during human hematopoiesis from scRNA-seq data

Single-Base Resolution Detection of Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing by Endonuclease-Mediated Sequencing