Primary metabolic tumor volume from <SUP>18</SUP>F-FDG PET/CT associated with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients

Xuhe Liao,Yonggang Cui,Xueqi Chen,Lijuan Di,Zhenghao Tong,Meng Liu,Rongfu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001274
2020-01-01
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Abstract:Purpose To explore the potential parameters from F-18-FDG PET/CT that might be associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. Methods Data of the test cohort of 191 patients and the validation cohort of 55 patients with newly diagnosed ADC were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT scans and EGFR mutation tests prior to treatment. The metabolic parameters obtained from F-18-FDG PET/CT combining with clinical characteristics were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Then two cohorts were enrolled to validate the predictive model by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), respectively. Results EGFR mutation-positive was seen of 33.0% (63/191) and 32.7% (18/55) in two cohorts, respectively. In univariate analysis, female, nonsmokers, metabolic parameters of primary tumor [mean standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (pMTV), and total lesion glycolysis], non-necrosis of primary tumor, and serum tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 19-9, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and precursor of gastrin releasing peptide (proGRP)] were significantly relevant with EGFR mutation. In multivariate analysis with adjustment of age and TNM stage, pMTV (<8.13 cm(3)), proGRP (>= 38.44 pg/ml) and women were independent significant predictors for EGFR mutation. The AUC for the predictive value of these factors was 0.739 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.665-0.813] in the cohort of 191 patients and 0.716 (95% CI 0.567-0.865) in the cohort of 55 patients, respectively. Conclusion Low pMTV (<8.13 cm(3)) was an independent predictor and could be integrated with women and high proGRP (>= 38.44 pg/ml) to enhance the discriminability on the EGFR mutation status in ADC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?