Is Intracranial Pressure Monitoring of Patients with Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury Valuable? an Observational Multicenter Study

Qiang Yuan,Xing Wu,Hongwei Cheng,Chaohua Yang,Yuhai Wang,Ersong Wang,Binghui Qiu,Zhimin Fei,Qing Lan,Sirong Wu,Yunzhao Jiang,Hua Feng,Jingfang Liu,Ke Liu,Fayun Zhang,Rongcai Jiang,Jianmin Zhang,Yue Tu,Xuehai Wu,Liangfu Zhou,Jin Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001050
IF: 5.315
2016-01-01
Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND Although intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation, any benefits remain controversial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of ICP monitoring on the mortality of and functional outcomes in patients with severe diffuse TBI. METHODS Data were collected on patients with severe diffuse TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score on admission <9 and Marshall Class II-IV) treated from January 2012 to December 2013 in 24 hospitals (17 level I trauma centers and 7 level II trauma centers) in 9 Chinese provinces. We evaluated the impact of ICP monitoring on 6-month mortality and favorable outcome using propensity score-matched analysis after controlling for independent predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS ICP monitors were inserted into 287 patients (59.5%). After propensity score matching, ICP monitoring significantly decreased 6-month mortality. ICP monitoring also had a greater impact on the most severely injured patients on the basis of head computed tomography data (Marshall computed tomography classification IV) and on patients with the lowest level of consciousness (GCS scores 3-5). After propensity score matching, monitoring remained nonassociated with a 6-month favorable outcome for the overall sample. However, monitoring had a significant impact on the 6-month favorable outcomes of patients with the lowest level of consciousness (GCS scores 3-5). CONCLUSION ICP monitor placement was associated with a significant decrease in 6-month mortality after adjustment for the baseline risk profile and the monitoring propensity of patients with diffuse severe TBI, especially those with GCS scores of 3 to 5 or of Marshall computed tomography classification IV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?