Voluntary Exploratory Data Submissions to the Us Fda and the Ema: Experience and Impact

Federico M. Goodsaid,Shashi Amur,Jiri Aubrecht,Michael E. Burczynski,Kevin Carl,Jennifer Catalano,Rosane Charlab,Sandra Close,Catherine Cornu-Artis,Laurent Essioux,Albert J. Fornace,Lois Hinman,Huixiao Hong,Ian Hunt,David Jacobson-Kram,Ansar Jawaid,David Laurie,Lawrence Lesko,Heng-Hong Li,Klaus Lindpaintner,James Mayne,Peter Morrow,Marisa Papaluca-Amati,Timothy W. Robison,John Roth,Ina Schuppe-Koistinen,Leming Shi,Olivia Spleiss,Weida Tong,Sharada L. Truter,Jacky Vonderscher,Agnes Westelinck,Li Zhang,Issam Zineh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3116
IF: 112.288
2010-01-01
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Abstract:Heterogeneity in the underlying mechanisms of disease processes and inter-patient variability in drug responses are major challenges in drug development. To address these challenges, biomarker strategies based on a range of platforms, such as microarray gene-expression technologies, are increasingly being applied to elucidate these sources of variability and thereby potentially increase drug development success rates. With the aim of enhancing understanding of the regulatory significance of such biomarker data by regulators and sponsors, the US Food and Drug Administration initiated a programme in 2004 to allow sponsors to submit exploratory genomic data voluntarily, without immediate regulatory impact. In this article, a selection of case studies from the first 5 years of this programme - which is now known as the voluntary exploratory data submission programme, and also involves collaboration with the European Medicines Agency - are discussed, and general lessons are highlighted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?