Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Adaptive Convergence at the Genomic Level-Prevalent, Uncommon or Very Rare?

Genomic Convergence in the Adaptation to Extreme Environments

Convergent Adaptive Evolution-How Common, Or How Rare?

A novel unbiased test for molecular convergent evolution and discoveries in echolocating, aquatic and high-altitude mammals

Adaptive Genic Evolution in the Drosophila Genomes

Estimates of molecular convergence reveal pleiotropic genes underlying adaptive variation across teleost fish

Frequent Nonallelic Gene Conversion on the Human Lineage and Its Effect on the Divergence of Gene Duplicates

A functional enrichment test for molecular convergent evolution finds a clear protein-coding signal in echolocating bats and whales

Molecular mechanisms of adaptive evolution in wild animals and plants

Per-Nucleus Crossover Covariation and Implications for Evolution

Detection and Quantification of Concerted Evolution and Molecular Drive

Genome-Wide Convergence During Evolution of Mangroves from Woody Plants

Convergent Evolution of Marine Mammals is Associated with Distinct Substitutions in Common Genes.

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences.

Predictable convergence in hemoglobin function has unpredictable molecular underpinnings

Rapid Increase in frequency of gene copy-number variants during experimental evolution in Caenorhabditis elegans

Two decades of suspect evidence for adaptive DNA-sequence evolution – Less negative selection misconstrued as positive selection

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation

Evolutionary paths toward multi-level convergence of lactic acid bacteria in fructose-rich environments

Skepticism toward adaptive signals in DNA sequence comparisons - Is the neutral theory dead yet?