And Yet It Moves: Clinical Outcomes and Motion Management in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) of Centrally Located Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Shedding Light on the Internal Organ at Risk Volume (IRV) Concept

Felix-Nikolai Oschinka Jegor Habermann,Daniela Schmitt,Thomas Failing,David Alexander Ziegler,Jann Fischer,Laura Anna Fischer,Manuel Guhlich,Stephanie Bendrich,Olga Knaus,Tobias Raphael Overbeck,Hannes Treiber,Alexander von Hammerstein-Equord,Raphael Koch,Rami El Shafie,Stefan Rieken,Martin Leu,Leif Hendrik Dröge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010231
2024-01-04
Cancers
Abstract:The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, n = 78; motion management, n = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the challenges faced in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes**: - Compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with centrally located tumors (≤2 cm from critical organs) versus those with peripherally located tumors (>2 cm from critical organs). - It was found that patients with centrally located tumors received a lower biologically effective dose (BED), had a larger planning target volume (PTV), higher lung doses, and poorer local regional control (LRC). 2. **Organ Motion Management**: - Study organ motion and its impact on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). - It was found that male and taller patients had greater bronchial tree motion, while patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) had smaller esophageal volume changes. - After applying the internal risk organ volume (IRV) concept, the NTCP of the bronchial tree increased by more than 10% in three patients. 3. **Need for Optimization Methods**: - Emphasize the need for optimization methods to balance dose escalation and toxicity, especially in the treatment of centrally located tumors. - Propose that the IRV concept can be used to optimize risk assessment, particularly as recent research efforts further classify centrally located tumors to refine treatment. In summary, this paper aims to explore how to better manage and optimize SBRT treatment plans for centrally located tumors by comparing the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of NSCLC patients in different locations.