Abstract:Background: Selective nerve root block has been widely used to treat degenerative disc disease (DDD), but no detailed research data is provided to compare the efficacy of epidural injection of anesthetics with or without steroids on the DDD treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to provide the first comparison of steroids + local anesthetic (LA) or LA alone for the treatment of DDD. Study design: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the clinical efficacy of both the steroids + LA group and the LA alone group, and subgroup analysis was also adopted. Setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random effects model on randomized controlled studies (RCTs). Methods: After reviewing titles, abstracts, risk of bias, and full texts of 15,889 studies that were chosen following removal of duplicates after the initial database search, finally, 19 RCTs were included. Pain rating, functional score, follow-up period, and other-related data were extracted from these included works, and the effect size and statistical significance were calculated by the random effects model. The quality and level of the derived evidence were assessed by means of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Results: In terms of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at one year, the combination of steroids + LA was obviously superior to LA. Subgroup analysis suggested that the combination of steroids + LA was more effective than LA alone in regard to the ODI in the lumbar group within 2 years. The opioids intake of patients treated by LA alone was less than that of the steroids + LA group within 3 months, and LA alone was more effective in pain score reduction, with more than 50% within 6 months in the interlaminar injection group. However, the combination of steroids + LA was more effective when alleviating the NRS-11 within 18 months in the caudal injection group. Limitations: Firstly, this analysis was inconsistent in technique, dosage, injection frequency, and follow-up period of epidural injections. Such differences may compromise the reported efficacy. Secondly, adverse reactions arising out of the 2 groups were not examined in that the included RCTs did not provide the data. Thirdly, different injection methods would compromise the outcomes, and no subgroup analysis was performed on different injection methods. Finally, these included articles that were mainly sourced from Manchikanti's team, and thus biased to some extent. Conclusions: The addition of steroids to anesthetic injectates was associated with a better NRS-11 and ODI compared with LA alone within one year in patients with DDD. Furthermore, the improvement of the ODI was observed within 2 years in patients with lumbar DDD.

Epidural Steroids Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy A Protocol For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Therapeutic effect analysis of targeted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Epidural Versus Intravenous Steroids Application Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Evaluation on Curative Effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Via a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Evaluation on Curative Effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Via a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Epidural Injection With or Without Steroids in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease: Meta-analysis

Comments on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Steroids for Epidural Injections in Spinal Stenosis

Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation: clinical efficacy and safety assessment

Steroid for Epidural Injection in Spinal Stenosis: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Meta-analysis of Epidural Steroid Injection on Lumbar Disc Herniation

A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Routes of Administration of Epidural Injections in Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Epidural Steroid in Controlling Pain After Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Efficacy of epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epidural Injections with or Without Steroids in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Trials

[Treatment of displacement-type lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion on L2-L5 with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy]

The Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) in the Treatment of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case-Control Study.

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for prolapsed and sequestrated L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Effects of Different Epidural Injection Approaches on Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation