Abstract:National annual inventories of CO2 emitted during fossil fuel consumption (FFCO2) bear 5–10% uncertainties for developed countries, and are likely higher at intra annual scales or for developing countries. Given the current international efforts of mitigating actions, there is a need for independent verifications of these inventories. Atmospheric inversion assimilating atmospheric gradients of CO2 and radiocarbon measurements could provide an independent way of monitoring FFCO2 emissions. A strategy would be to deploy such measurements over continental scale networks and to conduct continental to global scale atmospheric inversions targeting the national and one-month scale budgets of the emissions. Uncertainties in the high-resolution distribution of the emissions could limit the skill for such a large-scale inversion framework. This study assesses the impact of such uncertainties on the potential for monitoring the emissions at large scale. In practice, it is more specifically dedicated to the derivation, typical quantification and analysis of critical sources of errors that affect the inversion of FFCO2 emissions when solving for them at a relatively coarse resolution with a coarse grid transport model. These errors include those due to the mismatch between the resolution of the transport model and the spatial variability of the actual fluxes and concentrations (i.e. the representation errors) and those due to the uncertainties in the spatial and temporal distribution of emissions at the transport model resolution when solving for the emissions at large scale (i.e. the aggregation errors). We show that the aggregation errors characterize the impact of the corresponding uncertainties on the potential for monitoring the emissions at large scale, even if solving for them at the transport model resolution. We propose a practical method to quantify these sources of errors, and compare them with the precision of FFCO2 measurements (i.e. the measurement errors) and the errors in the modelling of atmospheric transport (i.e. the transport errors). The results show that both the representation and measurement errors can be much larger than the aggregation errors. The magnitude of representation and aggregation errors is sensitive to sampling heights and temporal sampling integration time. The combination of these errors can reach up to about 50% of the typical signals, i.e. the atmospheric large-scale mean afternoon FFCO2 gradients between sites being assimilated by the inversion system. These errors have large temporal auto-correlation scales, but short spatial correlation scales. This indicates the need for accounting for these temporal auto-correlations in the atmospheric inversions and the need for dense networks to limit the impact of these errors on the inversion of FFCO2 emissions at large scale. More generally, comparisons of the representation and aggregation errors to the errors in simulated FFCO2 gradients due to uncertainties in current inventories suggest that the potential of inversions using global coarse-resolution models (with typical horizontal resolution of a couple of degrees) to retrieve FFCO2 emissions at sub-continental scale could be limited, and that meso-scale models with smaller representation errors would effectively increase the potential of inversions to constrain FFCO2 emission estimates.

On the Assignment of Prior Errors in Bayesian Inversions of Co2 Surface Fluxes

What Eddy‐covariance Measurements Tell Us about Prior Land Flux Errors in CO2‐flux Inversion Schemes

Regional Inversion of CO2 Ecosystem Fluxes from Atmospheric Measurements: Reliability of the Uncertainty Estimates

Representing model uncertainty for global atmospheric CO2 flux inversions using ECMWF-IFS-46R1

CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements

Structure of the transport uncertainty in mesoscale inversions of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks using ensemble model simulations

Estimation of Observation Errors for Large-Scale Atmospheric Inversion of CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion

What Can We Learn from European Continuous Atmospheric CO2 Measurements to Quantify Regional Fluxes – Part 2: Sensitivity of Flux Accuracy to Inverse Setup

Inferring CO2 sources and sinks from satellite observations: Method and application to TOVS data

Impact of the Atmospheric Sink and Vertical Mixing on Nitrous Oxide Fluxes Estimated Using Inversion Methods

Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions

Improved definition of prior uncertainties in CO2 and CO fossil fuel fluxes and its impact on multi-species inversion with GEOS-Chem (v12.5)

State-dependent Errors in a Land Surface Model Across Biomes Inferred from Eddy Covariance Observations on Multiple Timescales

Temporal Error Correlations in a Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Model Derived by Comparison to Carbon Dioxide Eddy Covariance Flux Tower Measurements

Quantitative evaluation of the uncertainty sources for the modeling of atmospheric CO 2 concentration within and in the vicinity of Paris city

Optimizing a Process‐based Ecosystem Model with Eddy‐covariance Flux Measurements: A Pine Forest in Southern France

A European Summertime CO2biogenic Flux Inversion at Mesoscale from Continuous in Situ Mixing Ratio Measurements

Atmospheric Inversions for Estimating Co2 Fluxes: Methods and Perspectives

Inverse Modeling of Annual Atmospheric Co2 Sources and Sinks 2. Sensitivity Study

Estimating High Latitude Carbon Fluxes with Inversions of Atmospheric CO2

Daily Co2 Flux Estimates over Europe from Continuous Atmospheric Measurements: 1, Inverse Methodology