Quantifying Fluid‐Wettable Effective Pore Space in the Utica and Bakken Oil Shale Formations

Yuxiang Zhang,Qinhong Hu,Troy J. Barber,Markus Bleuel,Lawrence M. Anovitz,Kenneth Littrell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl087896
IF: 5.2
2020-01-01
Geophysical Research Letters
Abstract:Combined (ultra-) small angle neutron scattering measurements [(U)SANS] and a contrast matching technique were employed to quantify the porosity and pore size distribution from 1 nm to 10 mu m and to differentiate accessible (open) pores and inaccessible (closed) pores with respect to organophilic and hydrophilic fluids for two Utica and two Bakken shale samples. The results indicate that around 40-70% of the pores in the Utica oil shales (mixed carbonate mudstone) are accessible to oil, and 34-37% of the pore surfaces are water-wet. In contrast, the Bakken oil shales (mixed siliceous mudstone and carbonate/siliceous mudstone), which have high total organic carbon contents, have a higher proportion of isolated pore space that is not preferentially wet by oil or water, with less than 36% of the pores accessible to both fluids. In addition, for both formations, pores less than 3 nm in diameter are not oil accessible (organic matter related) but water accessible (clay tactoids related). Plain Language Summary The economics of shale reservoirs are affected by a steep initial production decline and low overall hydrocarbon recoveries. Shales are characterized by a wide spectrum of nm-mu m-sized pores with limited accessibility and mixed wettability due to the presence of both fine-grained minerals and organic matter; this leads to an intertwined relationship between pore size and wettability. This work develops an innovative approach to using (ultra-) small angle neutron scattering [(U)SANS], along with deuterium labeling of n-decane and water fluids, to separate oil- and water-accessible and wettable pore space over a wide pore size range of 1 nm to 10 mu m in two key U.S. shale oil reservoirs (Utica and Bakken). Our results quantify the proportion of oil- or water-accessible pore volume and size with respect to lithofacies and total organic carbon content. No oil-accessible pores less than 3 nm in diameter were found in these shales using this method. The approach and findings could help to explain both the slow hydrocarbon movement and steep production decline observed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?