Metaphorical Competence in Italian EFL students: an Empirical Study
Chiara Astrid Gebbia
Abstract:Due to their creative nature, metaphors enrich languages. However, metaphorical expressions may differ from one language/culture to another. Developing in a certain cultural environment, languages acquire a specificity that is usually conveyed by figurative expressions. A major difficulty in learning metaphors is therefore their cultural dependence, leading to different expressions for the same concept. When teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL), the cultural specificity of the language is as much essential as the grammatical system. Although culture cannot be taught, it is possible for students to observe it through culture-bound idioms. Yet, since it is difficult to find their equivalents in other languages, students lack confidence in using them correctly. Consequently, while their autonomous discourse is grammatically appropriate, it usually sounds unnatural, overliteral (Danesi, 1993, p. 490). Due to their illusory arbitrariness, metaphorical expressions are commonly presented as exceptions to be learnt by heart. In fact, most idioms are motivated by conceptual metaphors (CMs). Far from being mere rhetorical devices, metaphors are a process of the mind by which we conceive abstract concepts through concrete, physical ones (Lakoff and Johnson 1980, p. 454-5). For instance, the expression “I cannot digest those claims” is motivated by the conceptual metaphor IDEAS ARE FOOD: the concrete concept (FOOD) -a physical experience we are familiar withis used to understand the abstract one (IDEAS). Being a systematic production of our brain, pervasive in everyday language and life, CMs are applied constantly and automatically. If metaphors are a means of cognition, we can presume that focusing on metaphors can help students to think in terms of the new culture.
Psychology,Education,Linguistics