Effects of Selective Laser Melting Build Orientations on the Microstructure and Tensile Performance of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy

Zongyu Xie,Yu Dai,Xiaoqin Ou,Song Ni,Min Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139001
IF: 6.044
2020-01-01
Materials Science and Engineering A
Abstract:In this paper, Ti–6Al–4V alloy was fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) with different build orientations, namely SLM-1 and SLM-2, respectively. Microstructures of SLM-1 and SLM-2 were characterized by X-ray diffraction, optical microscope, scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope. The results show that the α and α′ phases in the hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure, as well as the residual β phase in the body centered cubic (bcc) structure, exist in both samples. However, different SLM build orientations led to varied cooling rates and α/α′ ratios in the final materials. The SLM-1 alloy with build orientation along its thickness direction had higher cooling rate and thus lower α/α′ ratio than the SLM-2 alloy with build orientation along the length direction. Besides, minor martensitic (α'') phase was observed in the SLM-1 alloy and acted as an intermediate phase between β and α′ phases. The low α/α′ ratio and existence of α'' phase in the SLM-1 alloy result in a relatively high tensile strength but deteriorated plasticity. Comparatively, the higher α/α′ ratio in the SLM-2 alloy without α'' martensite leads to a much better plasticity regardless of the slightly reduced tensile strength.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?