Age Might Confound the Impact of the Transmembrane 6 Superfamily Member 2 E167k Polymorphism on Hepatic Fibrosis in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients

Zhengtao Liu,Tianchi Chen,Yan Wang,Min Zhang,Lin Zhou,Shusen Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27899
IF: 17.298
2016-01-01
Hepatology
Abstract:Financial support for this work was received from the National S&T Major Project (no. 2012ZX10002017) and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.: 81421062). Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report. Author names in bold designate shared co‐first authorship To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Milano et al.1 published in Hepatology. The researchers discussed the impact of transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) as a “hot” single‐nucleotide polymorphism on the degree of steatosis and severity of histological damage in two independent cohorts of European hospital‐based patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, some results involving the validation cohort are questionable. First, carriers with variant TM6SF2 were 2 years younger than carriers with wild genotype according to the Supporting Information, and age also had a positive role in inducing the hepatic fibrosis process. Thus, collinearity existed between age and the TM6SF2 variant based on a multicovariate analysis of fibrosis in the validation cohort. Part of the contribution of the TM6SF2 E167K polymorphism on hepatic fibrosis in the validation cohort was underestimated with respect to the uneven age distribution of different polymorphisms. In addition, obesity (as indicated by body mass index or waist circumstance) is an important metabolic phenotype that exerts significant influence on hepatic lesions in patients infected with HCV or non‐HCV.2 Indeed, dismissing an adjustment for obesity in the multicovariate analysis also caused inevitable bias in evaluating risk for the TM6SF2 variant. Therefore, we suggest that specific risk evaluation for the TM6SF2 variant on hepatic fibrosis in the validation cohort1 should be considered with caution in a nonrigorous comparison given the uneven age distribution and absence of an obesity correction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?