Upper mantle structure beneath central Tibet derived from teleseismic S wave tomography along the INDEPTH-III profile

Liu Zhen,Tian Xiao-Bo,Liang Xiao-Feng,Teng Ji-Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20150407
2015-01-01
Abstract:The Tibetan Plateau is produced by the continental-continental collision between the India and Eurasian plates as well as the subsequent convergence. It has become a consensus that the crustal thickness beneath the plateau is twice of the normal continental crust, while the deformation of its mantle lithosphere, as an important part of the developing plateau, remains controversial. This ambiguity about the upper mantle structure is resulted from uneven distributed seismologic observations in Tibet, and upper mantle structure is possibly heterogeneous along the east-west direction. Another reason is that the seismic wave speed contrast between the continental mantle lithosphere and asthenosphere might not be significant to detect by current seismic methods. Because the geodynamic of mantle lithosphere is closely related to the processes of plateau uplift and the presence of volcanic rocks, revealing the geometry of Indian and Eurasian mantle lithosphere can help understanding the dynamic processes of mantle lithosphere as well as the evolution of the plateau. The INDEPTH-III profile located in the center of Tibet is about 400 km long with totally 60 broad-band seismometers. We calculated the residuals of travel times by multichannel cross-correlation of the teleseismic S waveforms recorded by the INDEPTH-III broad-band seismic array. In order to improve the reliability, we choose the events recorded by at least 8 stations, and choose the events of which back azimuth is less than 45 to the profile. We totally select 622 rays. The damping coefficient is fixed at 10. Then we calculate the perturbation of S wave velocity beneath the profile. The tomography of slowness anomalies is obtained beneath the Bangong-Nujiang suture after four iterations. Our results show that a north-dipping S wave high velocity anomaly is present in a depth range of 100 to 300 km beneath the Bangong-Nujiang suture, with a dipping angle about 65 degrees. The resolutions are 0.5 degrees in horizontal and 80 km in vertical directions, respectively. The high velocity anomaly found in this study is almost same as the P wave tomography of previous study (Tilmann et al. 2003), which is interpreted as the roll-backed Indian lithosphere or/and remnant of Indian mantle lithosphere from convective removal. S waves are more sensitive than P waves to temperature anomalies, while P waves are more sensitive to material composition. It results in some slight differences between our S wave tomography and the P wave tomography of previous study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?