Abstract:Low-frequency surface electromagnetic prospecting methods have been gaining a lot of interest because of their capabilities to directly detect hydrocarbon reservoirs and to compliment seismic measurements for geophysical exploration applications. There are two types of surface electromagnetic surveys. The first is an active measurement where we use an electric dipole source towed by a ship over an array of seafloor receivers. This measurement is called the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method. The second is the Magnetotelluric (MT) method driven by natural sources. This passive measurement also uses an array of seafloor receivers. Both surface electromagnetic methods measure electric and magnetic field vectors. In order to extract maximal information from these CSEM and MT data we employ a nonlinear inversion approach in their interpretation. We present two types of inversion approaches. The first approach is the so-called pixel-based inversion (PBI) algorithm. In this approach the investigation domain is subdivided into pixels, and by using an optimization process the conductivity distribution inside the domain is reconstructed. The optimization process uses the Gauss–Newton minimization scheme augmented with various forms of regularization. To automate the algorithm, the regularization term is incorporated using a multiplicative cost function. This PBI approach has demonstrated its ability to retrieve reasonably good conductivity images. However, the reconstructed boundaries and conductivity values of the imaged anomalies are usually not quantitatively resolved. Nevertheless, the PBI approach can provide useful information on the location, the shape and the conductivity of the hydrocarbon reservoir. The second method is the so-called model-based inversion (MBI) algorithm, which uses a priori information on the geometry to reduce the number of unknown parameters and to improve the quality of the reconstructed conductivity image. This MBI approach can also be used to refine the conductivity image obtained using the PBI approach. The MBI also adopts the multiplicative regularized Gauss–Newton method. The unknown parameters that govern the location and the shape of an anomaly are the locations of the user-defined nodes for the boundaries of the probed region, whereas the unknown parameter that describes the physical property is the conductivity. We will show some inversion results of synthetic and field data to demonstrate the advantages of both the PBI and MBI approaches. We further demonstrate that by combining both inversion algorithms we can arrive at a better interpretation of both CSEM and MT data.

Two-dimensional sharp boundary magnetotelluric inversion using Bayesian theory

Two-dimensional Magnetotelluric Modelling by the Boundary Element Method.

A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF RAPID TWO-DIMENSIONAL MT CURVE COMPARISON INVERSION

Two-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion method based on deep learning

Sensitivity study on two-dimensional and three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversions

A two-step three dimensional marine magnetotelluric inversion method with considering rugged seafloor topography: Synthetic studies

An Intelligent MT Data Inversion Method with Seismic Attribute Enhancement.

2D probabilistic inversion of MT data and uncertainty quantification using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method

Magnetotelluric Closed-Loop Inversion

2-D transdimensional joint inversion of radio magnetotelluric and electrical resistivity tomography data

Application Of Supervised Descent Method For 2d Magnetotelluric Data Inversion

Appraisal of the Magnetotelluric and Magnetovariational Transfer Functions' Selection in a 3-D Inversion

Power-Type Structural Self-Constrained Inversion Methods of Gravity and Magnetic Data

2D Magnetotelluric Inversion using Supervised Descent Method

3D magnetotelluric inversion using a limited-memory quasi-Newton optimization

An Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers Algorithm for 1-D Magnetotelluric Anisotropic Inversion Using Fourier Series Expansion

Robust inversion of 1D magnetotelluric data using the Huber loss function

Feature-based Magnetotelluric Inversion by Variational Autoencoder Using a Subdomain Encoding Scheme

Inversion Algorithms for Large-Scale Geophysical Electromagnetic Measurements

Gravity and Magnetic Data Inversion With Random Projection

Error effects on magnetotelluric inversion