Magnetostratigraphy and magnetic anisotropy of the Neogene sediments in the Qilian Basin

Liu Cai-Cai,Wang Wei-Tao,Zhang Pei-Zhen,Pang Jian-Zhang,Yu Jing-Xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20160820
2016-01-01
Abstract:Cenozoic sediments in intermountain basins of the Qilian Mountains are good recorders for Cenozoic tectonic events in this area. We have studied the Neogene sediments in the Qilian Basin, one of the intermountain basins of the Qilian Mountains. This basin located in the middle part of this mountain range. Detailed magnetostratigraphic and detrital fission track dating analyses combined with the study of sedimentary facies and lithology have been carried out on these sediments to study the tectonic evolution history of the Qilian Mountains. The Neogene sediments in this basin can be divided into two parts: the lower conglomerate and the upper sand layers. Magnetostratigraphic results suggest that the conglomerate layer formed during 10-14.3 Ma. The conglomerate started to form at about 14.3 Ma, suggesting an increasing tectonic activity of the Qilian Mountains since that time. Magnetic fabrics of the upper conglomerate section suggest that the tectonic stress acted on these sediments was consistent with that on the faults around the Qilian Basin. This may indicate that shear on these faults took place near 10 Ma. Our results suggest that the tectonic activity of the Middle Qilian Mountain might have largely increased since about 14.3 Ma, especially intensified at about 10 Ma. This is consistent with the ages of tectonic events in the Qilian Mountains revealed by low-temperature thermal-chronological data and sedimentary recording in great basins to the north and south. The characteristic magnetic remanence directions of samples from the sand layer fail the folding test. This suggests that the original depositional remanence may be remagnetized by post-folding magnetization. Therefore, we can not obtain the depositional age of the sand layer by magnetostratigraphy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?