Unstructured duple mesh based dual-parameters simultaneous inversion for 2D Radio-magnetotelluric data

Yuan Yuan,Pang Cheng,Tang JingTian,Ren ZhengYong,Zhou Cong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2019L0592
2019-01-01
Abstract:The radio-magnetotelluric (RMT) method is an electromagnetic method that employs the signals from remote radio transmitters. As a kind of near-surface geophysical prospecting method, RMT is widely used for engineering and environmental exploration in recent years. At present, most geophysical inversion for electromagnetic data is aimed at the reconstruction of the resistivity and make the forward responses fit the observed data. However, the percentage of wave field which caused by permittivity in the total field can be up to 20% for the RMT data which collected at the frequency ranges from 10 similar to 300 kHz. Inversion for reconstructing a resistivity model but neglecting the effect of permittivity may lead to a false interpretation. To solve this problem, this paper presents an algorithm for the simultaneous inversion of the dielectric permittivity and the electrical resistivity dual-parameters. We developed a new dual-parameters based objective function and derived the dual-parameters inverse equations. With sensitivity analysis, we evaluated the effect of the resistivity and permittivity on the forward responses, proposed the concept of the relative electrical conductivity and unified the scale of the sensitivity of the two parameters. We studied the effect of reference frequency and the two regularization factors on the inversion results, put forward an optimum parameter selection scheme in the general cases. Based on unstructured triangle meshes, our code can model arbitrary surface topography. The local refinement technology was used for mesh discretization, which improved the speed and accuracy of inversion procedure. At last, the reliability and effectiveness of our dual-parameters inversion program are demonstrated by synthetic examples. Data with topography are inversed by both ordinary and our new schemes. The ordinary resistivity inversion cannot reflect the anomalous body correctly, while our dual-parameters inversion can provide better results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?