Abstract:Corporations must routinely ask “how should we allocate existing financial and human resources among our brands to grow shareholder value?” Firms should focus on getting the most from existing brands through better organizing and managing brands and brand inter‐relationships within the existing portfolio. “Brand architecture” is the way a company organizes, manages, and markets their brands. It must align with and support business goals and strategies. Different business strategies require different brand architectures. The two most common types are: “Branded house” architecture – employs a single (master) brand to span a series of offerings that may operate with descriptive sub‐brand names and “House of brands” architecture – each brand is stand‐alone; the sum of performance of the independent brands is greater than they would be if under a master brand. Neither type is better than the other. Some companies use a mix of both. The key is to have a well‐defined brand architecture strategy. Steps to maximize brand architecture: take stock of your brand portfolio from the perspective of customers because their view is the foundation for your strategy; do “brand relationship mapping” to identify the relationships and opportunities between brands across your portfolio. Check for these criteria: the perceived or potential credibility of the brands in that space – the perceptual license; whether or not the company currently has or can develop competencies in that space – the organizational capabilities; and whether the size and current or potential growth of the market is significant enough to merit exploitation and investment – the market opportunity. Mine the opportunities where all three criteria are met (aka, the “sweet spot”). Or use these innovative strategies if all criteria do not intersect: “pooling” and “trading,” branded partnerships’, strategic brand consolidation, brand acquisition, new brand creation. Continuously emphasize the portfolio‐wide thinking and business‐wide implications of brand‐oriented decisions. Create a brand council. When managed strategically and used as a structure to anticipate future business and brand needs, concerns, and issues, brand architecture can be the critical link to business strategy and the means to optimize growth and brand value.

Influence of Brand Portfolio Strategy on Performance

The Nonlinear Effects Of Brand Value On Shareholder Value

Mediating Role of Customer Value Co-creation and Internal Branding Between Brand Orientation and Brand Performance: Moderating Effect of Enterprise Innovative Capabilities-Evidence From Agri Product Users

Brand portfolio strategy and brand architecture: A comparative study

Effects of Brand Portfolio and Product Line Strategy on Brand Market Share: Evidence from Chinese Cellphone Market

Co-Branding Strategy As A New Competitive Weapon

Market orientation, positioning strategy and brand performance

Research on the Importance of Branding Based on The Case Analysis of L'ORÉAL and Yatsen

The Impacts of Logo Dynamism and Product Types on Brand Market Performance

Exploring automobile brand power: a multi-dimensional approach

Effect of a platform's private brand on the manufacturer's dual-channel management strategies

Portfolio effects of knowledge management strategies on firm performance: Complementarity or substitutability?

Brands portfolios and competitive advantage: an empirical study

Brand architecture: building brand portfolio value

Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Brand Marketing Strategies and Marketing Performance of Agricultural Science and Technology Enterprises

The Research on the Influence Factors for Fitness Between Technology Strategy and Corporate Strategy

Influence of High-Performance Composite Sports Equipment on Brand International Sports Marketing Strategy

The Construction of Automotive Media Multi-Brand Matrix and Brand Synergy Strategy

Diversification, Branding, and Performance of Professional Service Firms

Corporate branding and corporate brand performance

Business Strategy and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Product Market Competition