Abstract:Stellar population models of absorption line indices are an important tool for the analysis of stellar population spectra. They are most accurately modelled through empirical calibrations of absorption line indices with the stellar parameters effective temperature, metallicity, and surface gravity, the so-called fitting functions. Here we present new empirical fitting functions for the 25 optical Lick absorption line indices based on the new stellar library MILES. The major improvements with respect to the Lick/IDS library are the better sampling of stellar parameter space, a generally higher signal- to-noise, and a careful flux calibration. In fact we find that errors on individual index measurements in MILES are considerably smaller than in Lick/IDS. Instead we find the rms of the residuals between the final fitting functions and the data to be dominated by errors in the stellar parameters. We provide fitting functions for both Lick/IDS and MILES spectral resolutions, and compare our results with other fitting functions in the literature. A Fortran 90 code is available online in order to simplify the implementation in stellar population models. We further calculate the offsets in index measurements between the Lick/IDS system to a flux calibrated system. For this purpose we use the three libraries MILES, ELODIE, and STELIB. We find that offsets are negligible in some cases, most notably for the widely used indices Hbeta, Mgb, Fe5270, and Fe5335. In a number of cases, however, the difference between flux calibrated library and Lick/IDS is significant with the offsets depending on index strengths. Interestingly, there is no general agreement between the three libraries for a large number of indices, which hampers the derivation of a universal offset between the Lick/IDS and flux calibrated systems.

ERRATUM: “ON THE BINDING ENERGY PARAMETER Λ OF COMMON ENVELOPE EVOLUTION” (2010, ApJ, 716, 114)

Correction: Chen et al., Orbital Angular Momentum Generation and Detection by Geometric-Phase Based Metasurfaces. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 362

ON THE BINDING ENERGY PARAMETER Λ OF COMMON ENVELOPE EVOLUTION

Erratum: The Transient Outgassed Atmosphere of 55 Cancri e (2023, ApJL, 956, L20)

Erratum: Dynamics of the Bounds of Squared Concurrence [phys. Rev. A 79, 032306 (2009)]

The binding energy parameter for common envelope evolution

Erratum: Double peaked low ionization emission lines in active galactic nuclei (Astronomical Journal (2003) 126 (1720))

Erratum: “Multiwavelength Monitoring of the Dwarf Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 4395. I. A Reverberation‐based Measurement of the Black Hole Mass” (ApJ, 632, 799 [2005])

Erratum: The evolutionary genetics of personality

Erratum To: Strong Gravitational Lensing in the Einstein-Proca Theory

Erratum: “an Accurate Analytic Mass Model for Lensing Galaxies” (2020, ApJ, 892, 62)

Erratum to: Constraints on new physics from K →πνν̅

Optical parameters estimation in inhomogeneous turbid media using backscattered light: for transcutaneous scattering measurement of intravascular blood: erratum

Erratum: “dependence of 3D Self-correlation Level Contours on the Scales in the Inertial Range of Solar Wind Turbulence” (2019, ApJL, 883, L9)

Erratum: “Observations of Water Vapor Outflow from NML Cygnus” (ApJ, 610, 427 [2004])

Empirical calibrations of optical absorption line indices based on the stellar library MILES

Modeling of Ultraviolet Scattering Propagation and Its Applicability Analysis: Erratum.

Erratum: Gravitational Echoes of Lepton Number Symmetry Breaking with Light and Ultralight Majorons

Comments on “Corrigendum to ‘Thermodynamic solubility of tetraethyl ranelate in ten organic solvents at different temperatures. [J. Mol. Liq. 216 (2016) 771–780]’”

An Empirical Sample of Spectra of M-type Stars with Homogeneous Atmospheric-Parameter Labels